2019 IEEE 8th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ddcls.2019.8908877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and Counting the Moving Vehicles Using Mask R-CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the traditional method cannot track moving vehicles under the crowded environments, but our method also can performance well with a high accuracy at 92%. Compared with the method presented in [18] that was based on Mask R-CNN and Kalman Fileter, our methods are with similar accuracy, but the speed of our method is obviously higher. When images are resized to 640 * 360, the speed of whole framework (detecting, tracking and counting) of the method in [18] is about 2.86fps, while the speed of whole framework in our work is about 20fps.…”
Section: Vehicle Tracking and Counting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that the traditional method cannot track moving vehicles under the crowded environments, but our method also can performance well with a high accuracy at 92%. Compared with the method presented in [18] that was based on Mask R-CNN and Kalman Fileter, our methods are with similar accuracy, but the speed of our method is obviously higher. When images are resized to 640 * 360, the speed of whole framework (detecting, tracking and counting) of the method in [18] is about 2.86fps, while the speed of whole framework in our work is about 20fps.…”
Section: Vehicle Tracking and Counting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Compared with the method presented in [18] that was based on Mask R-CNN and Kalman Fileter, our methods are with similar accuracy, but the speed of our method is obviously higher. When images are resized to 640 * 360, the speed of whole framework (detecting, tracking and counting) of the method in [18] is about 2.86fps, while the speed of whole framework in our work is about 20fps. Therefore, as for the speed of detecting and tracking, our method perform much better.…”
Section: Vehicle Tracking and Counting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from the experimental results in Table 1 that compared with previous method [17][18], our method can track and count moving vehicles in various and complex conditions. While the performance of previous method in crowded scene and large perspective is bad, and the previous method of [17] can't work in crowded weather, our method also can reach a good balance between accuracy and speed.…”
Section: Object Tracking Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two-stage detection networks represented by Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN, and Mask R-CNN, generally have high detection precision. However, the algorithms based on region proposals often have high complexity and long calculation time, which cannot meet the real-time requirements of vehicle detection in the actual road scenes [28][29][30]. One-stage detection network is represented by YOLO, YOLOv2, and SSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%