Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR 2002
DOI: 10.1145/564388.564391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and Browsing Events in Unstructured text

Abstract: Previews and overviews of large, heterogeneous information resources help users comprehend the scope of collections and focus on particular subsets of interest. For narrative documents, questions of "what happened? where? and when?" are natural points of entry. Building on our earlier work at the Perseus Project with detecting terms, place names, and dates, we have exploited co-occurrences of dates and place names to detect and describe likely events in document collections. We compare statistical measures for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their method extracted dates from sentences, ranked them, and then chronologically ordered. Smith [42] measured the co-occurrences of dates and place names in historical corpora to detect the events mentioned in document collections and analyzed how various interest measures (raw counts, chi-square, log likelihood, etc.) performed for ranking rare events.…”
Section: Topic Detection and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method extracted dates from sentences, ranked them, and then chronologically ordered. Smith [42] measured the co-occurrences of dates and place names in historical corpora to detect the events mentioned in document collections and analyzed how various interest measures (raw counts, chi-square, log likelihood, etc.) performed for ranking rare events.…”
Section: Topic Detection and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the differences in their story representations, we distinguish between three types of TTM tracking methods: (a) keyword representation, (b) group representation, and (c) combo representation methods. Type (a) methods use a list of bursty n-grams ranked by their burst scores (Kleinberg, 2002;Fung, Yu, Yu, & Lu, 2005;Gruhl, Guha, Kumar, Novak, & Tomkins, 2005;He, Chang, Lim, & Zhang, 2007;Smith, 2002). Type (b) methods assemble bursty n-grams into groups which point to subjects (Fung et al, 2005;Wang & McCallum, 2006;Mei & Zhai, 2005;Schult & Spiliopoulou, 2006;Janssens, Glänzel, & Moor, 2007).…”
Section: Summarizing Temporally-indexed Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers address the task of detecting events in texts. They introduce methods for identifying new events in unstructured texts [11], propose techniques for browsing document collections in order to detect events [16] and present ways of finding novel events in a temporarily ordered stream of news stories [19]. Some papers analyze correlations between online communication and stock movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%