2012
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and annotating genetic variations using the HugeSeq pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For deletions, we see significant overlap as well as variant calls that are specific to each method ( Figure S5A), but overlap is less for duplications ( Figure S5B) and inversions ( Figure S5C). This is consistent with what has been shown previously (Lam et al 2012) as inversions and duplications are more difficult in principle to accurately resolve. Since each SV detection method is designed to use different types of signals and also optimized to identify different classes of SVs, such overlaps are also expected.…”
Section: Cc-by-nc-ndsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For deletions, we see significant overlap as well as variant calls that are specific to each method ( Figure S5A), but overlap is less for duplications ( Figure S5B) and inversions ( Figure S5C). This is consistent with what has been shown previously (Lam et al 2012) as inversions and duplications are more difficult in principle to accurately resolve. Since each SV detection method is designed to use different types of signals and also optimized to identify different classes of SVs, such overlaps are also expected.…”
Section: Cc-by-nc-ndsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Consistent with previous analysis (Lam et al 2012), deletions show the highest concordance among the various methods of detection compared to duplication and inversion calls ( Figure S5). As expected, we detected a 520 bp deletion in exon 3 of the β-catenin (CTNNB1) gene (Dataset 4, Supplemental Data), which was previously documented to exist in HepG2 (López-Terrada et al 2009b).…”
Section: Svs Identified From Deep Short-insert Wgssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Single nucleotide variants, short insertions and deletions (<100 bp Indels), and structural variants will be scored using the HugeSeq pipeline (Lam et al, 2012). For each PBMC sample, the transcriptome will be analyzed using RNA-seq, involving the random primed synthesis of cDNA from RNA depleted of rRNA.…”
Section: Ihmp Study: Microbiome and Host Changes During Respiratory Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ultimately used the genotypes from the available “MasterVar Beta” files provided by CGI directly and did not consider additional filtering steps for the analysis of genotypes beyond those that went into the construction of the public domain files. The 69 individual genomes consisted of 22 individuals of Northern European ancestry (abbreviated here as CE for the CEPH or CEU HapMap Population (Consortium, 2005; Frazer et al, 2007), 10 individuals of Yoruban ancestry (YR), five individuals each of Mexican (ME), and African ancestry living in Dallas (AS), four individuals each of Japanese (JP), Han Chinese (CH), Italian (TS), East Indian (GI), Maasai Kenyan (MK), and Luhya Kenyan (LW) ancestry, and three individuals of Puerto Rican ancestry (PU). Thirteen CE individuals were the offspring of a couple of other CE individuals and were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%