2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1706.01761
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed opacity calculations for astrophysical applications

Jean-Christophe Pain,
Franck Gilleron,
Maxime Comet

Abstract: Nowadays, several opacity codes are able to provide data for stellar structure models, but the computed opacities may show significant differences. In this work, we present state-of-the-art precise spectral opacity calculations, illustrated by stellar applications. The essential role of laboratory experiments to check the quality of the computed data is underlined. We review some X-ray and XUV laser and Z-pinch photo-absorption measurements as well as X-ray emission spectroscopy experiments involving hot dense… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the method to evaluate the chemical potential in the up-to-date version of the Starrett and Saumon model does not lead to significant inaccuracies, the account of ion correlations appears to be not very important in the context of the solar opacity problem, thus favoring the assumption that this problem is caused by the existence of some unaccounted deficiencies of the solar modeling (see, e.g., Ref. [15]) rather than by any substantial inaccuracies in the theoretical opacity data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the method to evaluate the chemical potential in the up-to-date version of the Starrett and Saumon model does not lead to significant inaccuracies, the account of ion correlations appears to be not very important in the context of the solar opacity problem, thus favoring the assumption that this problem is caused by the existence of some unaccounted deficiencies of the solar modeling (see, e.g., Ref. [15]) rather than by any substantial inaccuracies in the theoretical opacity data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that detailed calculations of solar opacities using those models, e.g. ATOMIC [7][8][9], OPAS [10][11][12], and SCO-RCG [13][14][15] as well as the earlier OP (Opacity Project) [16][17][18][19] and OPAL [20] calculations, yield similar results, being however unable to explain the data of helioseismic observations and neutrino measurements. This contradiction along with the unexpected results of the Z-machine experiment [6] have spurred the efforts to reveal further potential improvements of theoretical opacity data [15,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%