2017
DOI: 10.3390/atoms5020022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Opacity Calculations for Astrophysical Applications

Abstract: Nowadays, several opacity codes are able to provide data for stellar structure models, but the computed opacities may show significant differences. In this work, we present state-of-the-art precise spectral opacity calculations, illustrated by stellar applications. The essential role of laboratory experiments to check the quality of the computed data is underlined. We review some X-ray and XUV laser and Z-pinch photo-absorption measurements as well as X-ray emission spectroscopy experiments involving hot dense… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difficulty with this issue is that the observed discrepancies can originate from multiple sources. Amongst them, the alleged largest contributor is the radiative opacity, which is thought to be underestimated for the physical conditions of the BCZ (Bailey et al 2015;Iglesias 2015;Nahar & Pradhan 2016;Zhao et al 2018;Pain et al 2018), although the origin of the discrepancy is still under debate (Blancard et al 2016;Iglesias & Hansen 2017;Pain et al 2017). However, other inputs of standard models can also contribute to the discrepancies, such as the equation of state, the formalism used for microscopic diffusion, the formalism of convection or the nuclear reaction rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty with this issue is that the observed discrepancies can originate from multiple sources. Amongst them, the alleged largest contributor is the radiative opacity, which is thought to be underestimated for the physical conditions of the BCZ (Bailey et al 2015;Iglesias 2015;Nahar & Pradhan 2016;Zhao et al 2018;Pain et al 2018), although the origin of the discrepancy is still under debate (Blancard et al 2016;Iglesias & Hansen 2017;Pain et al 2017). However, other inputs of standard models can also contribute to the discrepancies, such as the equation of state, the formalism used for microscopic diffusion, the formalism of convection or the nuclear reaction rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of stellar opacities is generally so complicated that opacities have to be obtained in stellar modelling through interpolation in tables. The computation of the tables includes contributions of transitions between the different levels of the atoms and ions in the gas, including as far as possible the effects of level perturbations; an extensive review of opacity calculations was provided by Pain et al (2017). The thermodynamic state of the gas, including the degrees of ionization and the distribution amongst the levels, is an important ingredient in the calculation; indeed, both the MHD and the OPAL equations of state were developed as bases for new opacity calculations.…”
Section: Opacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of the astronomical observations of cosmic plasmas requires a quantitative understanding of the quantum processes that lead to the emission or absorption of photons and that govern the charge balance of atoms and ions in a plasma. The photoionization and photoabsorption of atomic ions are important in connection with radiation transport, e.g., in stars [1] or kilonovae [2] and whenever a cosmic plasma is within the line of sight between the observer and a radiation source such as, e.g., a star, an X-ray binary, or an active galactic nucleus. Absorption spectra that were recorded by X-ray telescopes contain spectral signatures of the atomic ions contained in the plasma [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%