2012
DOI: 10.1520/jte104356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Investigation of Forming Limit Determination Standards for Aluminum Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the evaluation shows that a cross-shaped pattern with insufficiently heated zones with a minimum temperature of 322 °C is recognizable at the heat treated specimens. Studies have already shown in the past that multiple irradiations of the same component area cause an increase in distortion angle [15], so no overlapping of the irradiation points was used to achieve a more homogeneous temperature distribution of the samples. For linearly treated components, the maximum temperature of up to 456 °C indicates a significant temperature rise.…”
Section: Temperature Distribution Of Different Radiation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the evaluation shows that a cross-shaped pattern with insufficiently heated zones with a minimum temperature of 322 °C is recognizable at the heat treated specimens. Studies have already shown in the past that multiple irradiations of the same component area cause an increase in distortion angle [15], so no overlapping of the irradiation points was used to achieve a more homogeneous temperature distribution of the samples. For linearly treated components, the maximum temperature of up to 456 °C indicates a significant temperature rise.…”
Section: Temperature Distribution Of Different Radiation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both aluminum alloy conditions, forming limit diagrams were determined. The FLDs were constructed using the Nakajima method [16]. The test samples were formed by a 600 kN Zwick model BUP 600 test machine.…”
Section: Determination Of Forming Limit Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although necking due to load instability is not possible in biaxial tension, local imperfections in the thickness can lead to localized strains and necking [3]. Usually, a single local neck forms perpendicular to the direction of larger principal strain (ε1) [3,62,63]. In this case, surfaces were machined precisely and there was no significant thickness variation along the surface that would cause imperfections (Figure 4.7).…”
Section: Obtaining Large Strains and Fracture At The Centermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Microstructure scale strain map. the neck, the major strain quickly reaches to the fracture limit, preventing material to deform under equibiaxial tension until fracture[3,62,63].When experimentally determining the FLC, the standard procedure (ISO 12004-2:2008)[53,61] is to smooth out the major strain inside the neck, resulting in approximately equal strains as the limits under biaxial tension[61]. Analytical methods such as Marciniak -Kuczynski analysis (known as the M-K analysis) or numerical methods can also model and simulate the FLC[64,65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation