2018
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed insights into pan‐European population structure and inbreeding in wild and hatchery Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) revealed by genome‐wide SNP data

Abstract: Cultivated bivalves are important not only because of their economic value, but also due to their impacts on natural ecosystems. The Pacific oyster ( Crassostrea gigas ) is the world's most heavily cultivated shellfish species and has been introduced to all continents except Antarctica for aquaculture. We therefore used a medium‐density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array to investigate the genetic structure of this species in Europe, where it was introduced during the 1960s and h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be the case for the Pacific oyster C. gigas, for which several repeated introductions from Canada and Japan of adults, but also high quantities of spat, happened by the end of the 1960s in Europe, especially in France and the Netherlands [23,84]. Hence our results confirm an absence of detection of clear differences between the source population and the French populations of C. gigas as several other studies did even with a far higher number of markers [21,42,50,61,85,86]. We failed at detecting differences between Asian and European populations within each species [42] because our 80 SNPs panel was not well adapted for detecting such structure if it exists.…”
Section: Confirmation Of a High Homogeneity Within The Pacific Cuppedsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be the case for the Pacific oyster C. gigas, for which several repeated introductions from Canada and Japan of adults, but also high quantities of spat, happened by the end of the 1960s in Europe, especially in France and the Netherlands [23,84]. Hence our results confirm an absence of detection of clear differences between the source population and the French populations of C. gigas as several other studies did even with a far higher number of markers [21,42,50,61,85,86]. We failed at detecting differences between Asian and European populations within each species [42] because our 80 SNPs panel was not well adapted for detecting such structure if it exists.…”
Section: Confirmation Of a High Homogeneity Within The Pacific Cuppedsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although HTS has allowed the development of medium-density SNP panelsand whole genome resequencing of hundreds of individuals in oysters [47,[60][61][62], those approaches do not always scale to specific questions that only require small SNP panels. The level of precision for inferring individual ancestry for species identification requires only a handful of ancestry informative markers, typically one or two per chromosome.…”
Section: A New Flexible Tool To Differentiate the Two Oyster Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population genetic analyses to date have not found evidence for bottlenecks during Pacific oyster introductions in BC or France (Sun & Hedgecock, 2017; Vendrami et al, 2018). Very low genetic differentiation between translocated naturalized populations and Japanese populations has been observed (Vendrami et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population genetic analyses to date have not found evidence for bottlenecks during Pacific oyster introductions in BC or France (Sun & Hedgecock, 2017; Vendrami et al, 2018). Very low genetic differentiation between translocated naturalized populations and Japanese populations has been observed (Vendrami et al, 2018). In regions that have been recently colonized with rapid expansion of oyster populations, such as the Wadden Sea of Denmark, lower genetic diversity is observed (Vendrami et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation