2013
DOI: 10.1149/2.063309jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Electrochemical Probing of a Biologically Active Isoquinoline

Abstract: The detailed electrochemistry of a biologically active isoquinoline, 2-benzoyl-7-methoxy-2,3-dihydroisoquinoline-4(1H)-one (IQN) was carried out in different pH media with the objective of elucidating its redox mechanism. Cyclic voltammetry was used to determine pka, diffusion coefficient and heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant. The involvement of protons in redox mechanism was confirmed from a shift in peak potential as a function of pH. Differential pulse voltammetry was used to verify the number o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the active surface area of the nanomaterials deposited at GCE, CV experiments were performed in 5 mM standard [Fe­(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– redox probe at 100 mV/s scan rate. The assessment of the effective surface area, employing the Randles–Sevcik equation, reveal active surface area values of 0.02 cm 2 , 0.05 cm 2 , 0.08 cm 2 , and 0.12 cm 2 for GCE, ZnO NPs/GCE, ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE, and f CNTs/ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE respectively, where the integrated nanocomposite f CNTs/ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE exhibits a 6-fold increase in the active surface area for nanocomposite compared to bare GCE (Figure a). Thereby, at the nanocomposite sensor, the maximum peak current signals and lowest peak potential difference are evidence of its robust electrocatalytic activity owing to the greater active surface area than unmodified GCE and other modified electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the active surface area of the nanomaterials deposited at GCE, CV experiments were performed in 5 mM standard [Fe­(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– redox probe at 100 mV/s scan rate. The assessment of the effective surface area, employing the Randles–Sevcik equation, reveal active surface area values of 0.02 cm 2 , 0.05 cm 2 , 0.08 cm 2 , and 0.12 cm 2 for GCE, ZnO NPs/GCE, ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE, and f CNTs/ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE respectively, where the integrated nanocomposite f CNTs/ZnO/ f CNTs/GCE exhibits a 6-fold increase in the active surface area for nanocomposite compared to bare GCE (Figure a). Thereby, at the nanocomposite sensor, the maximum peak current signals and lowest peak potential difference are evidence of its robust electrocatalytic activity owing to the greater active surface area than unmodified GCE and other modified electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A regular shift in the location of cathodic peak with change in pH of the medium indicated the involvement of proton during electron transfer reaction. [22][23][24][25] The dislocation of peak stopped at pH close to10 indicating the reduction of HAC to occur only by the involvement of electrons in highly alkaline conditions. 26 Intersection of the linear segments of peak potential versus pH plot (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior demonstrated the electron transfer reactions of DHDN to depend strongly on the pH of the medium. 24,25 CVs of 1 mM DHDN were also recorded at different scan rates in medium buffered at pH 7.0. The slight displacement of reduction potentials to more negative values with increasing scan rate (Îœ) indicated the quasi-reversibility of cathodic processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the scan rate dependent cyclic voltammetric peak current response of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3−/4− the active working area of the GC electrodes was determined using Randles–Sevcik equation ( I p = 2.69 × 10 5 n 3/2 D 1/2 Îœ 1/2 AC ). 30 The calculated active surface areas of working electrode are listed in Table S1. † The GCE fabricated with NH 2 - f MWCNTs and HOOC- f MWCNTs (layer by layer) exhibits 5.5 times more electroactive surface area as compared to bare GCE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%