“…Despite the 9p24.3 deletion being microscopic and does not to include the critical region for the consensus phenotype of 9p syndrome (Swinkels et al, 2008), both cousins showed clinical features of this syndrome including neuropsychomotor delay, hypotonia, trigonocephaly, midface hypoplasia, upslanted palpebral fissures, flat nasal bridge, long philtrum, and small and malformed ears, in agreement with previous descriptions for this syndrome (Alfi et al, 1973;Huret et al, 1988;Calvari et al, 2000;Faas et al, 2007;Barbaro et al, 2009), which is in agreement with Hauge et al (2008), who described that the minimal deleted region shared by their patients with clinically relevant phenotypes includes the first 2 Mb of 9pter, region distal to the previously described critical region 9p22.3. Therefore, it is likely that phenotypic features attributed to the 9p-deletion syndrome may be caused by multiple regions on 9p or other modifying factors in the genome (Hauge et al, 2008). Similarly, Barbaro et al (2009) suggested that the mild cranial dysmorphism in patients with deletions distal to Swinkels' critical region could be caused by either misregulation of the candidate gene for trigonocephaly or the deletion of another gene(s) involved in craniofacial development.…”