2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
109
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…(20), the response for various combinations of f mas , E mas and e 2 is presented; based on these results, the values selected were: f mas = 1.65 MPa, E mas = 1700 MPa and e 2 = 0.002. The value of f mas = 1.65 MPa for the compressive strength of the masonry suggests very low resistance, which should not be considered as unusual for existing structures, especially those with poor mechanical properties of mortar [42,43]. analysis e 2 =0.0015 Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of U 2 Framementioning
confidence: 98%
“…(20), the response for various combinations of f mas , E mas and e 2 is presented; based on these results, the values selected were: f mas = 1.65 MPa, E mas = 1700 MPa and e 2 = 0.002. The value of f mas = 1.65 MPa for the compressive strength of the masonry suggests very low resistance, which should not be considered as unusual for existing structures, especially those with poor mechanical properties of mortar [42,43]. analysis e 2 =0.0015 Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of U 2 Framementioning
confidence: 98%
“…As an example, interstorey height can be easily estimated from code prescription and literature data (e.g., Bal et al 2006), as well as the design spectral acceleration S a,d (T) can be obtained from code prescription at the age of construction. R  is a result of the design approach that reflects obsolete design practice more than current capacity design provisions and it is conservatively estimated equal to 1.10.…”
Section: Fragility Curves and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding external infills, thickness (t w ) is considered equal to 20 cm. For the evaluation of internal infills, it is assumed that their area in each direction is equal to 50% of the area of external infills, in analogy with the assumption made by Bal et al (2006). Openings are computed through the strength reduction coefficients provided by Kakaletsis and Karayannis (2009).…”
Section: Fast Calibration On Pettino Fragilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each frame, infill panels are uniformly distributed along the height (see Figure 1). Panel thickness is equal to 200 mm, corresponding to a double layer brick infill (120+80) mm thick, which can be considered as typical of a non-structural infill masonry wall [34]. Presence of openings is not taken into account.…”
Section: Case Study Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%