2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Abundances in the Ultra-faint Magellanic Satellites Carina II and III

Abstract: We present the first detailed elemental abundances in the ultra-faint Magellanic satellite galaxies Carina II (Car II) and Carina III (Car III). With high-resolution Magellan/MIKE spectroscopy, we determined abundances of nine stars in Car II including the first abundances of an RR Lyrae star in an ultra-faint dwarf galaxy; and two stars in Car III. The chemical abundances demonstrate that both systems are clearly galaxies and not globular clusters. The stars in these galaxies mostly display abundance trends m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
2
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Minor et al (2019) used a similar method to investigate Ret II with a smaller spectroscopic sample, concluding that f b > 0.5 at 90% confidence. This result is strongly inconsistent with our measurements, which will require further investigation, but we note that the Minor et al analysis relies on the very small quoted velocity uncertainties from , which subsequent work suggests may have been underestimated (Ji et al 2020). The first photometric determination of the binary fraction in UFDs was by Geha et al (2013), who modeled HST color-magnitude diagrams of Hercules and Leo IV to measure f b = 0.47 +0.16 −0.14 and f b = 0.47 +0.37 −0.17 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Minor et al (2019) used a similar method to investigate Ret II with a smaller spectroscopic sample, concluding that f b > 0.5 at 90% confidence. This result is strongly inconsistent with our measurements, which will require further investigation, but we note that the Minor et al analysis relies on the very small quoted velocity uncertainties from , which subsequent work suggests may have been underestimated (Ji et al 2020). The first photometric determination of the binary fraction in UFDs was by Geha et al (2013), who modeled HST color-magnitude diagrams of Hercules and Leo IV to measure f b = 0.47 +0.16 −0.14 and f b = 0.47 +0.37 −0.17 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Our values are different from the velocities determined for the stars by Simon et al (2020), who find V hel =−108.6±1.0 kms −1 , −108.1±1.0kms −1 , and −109.3±1.0kms −1 for J220423, J220409, and J220352, respectively. However, J220423 and J220409 were both observed at high airmass, 1.8 and 1.6 respectively, which can cause offsets in the radial velocities (Ji et al 2020), and J220352 is likely in a binary system (Simon et al 2020).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The abundances of s-process elements show large variation even among our simulated UFDs, which are uncontaminated by r-process enrichment. Ba and Sr abundances are higher in the L-UFD than in M- (Suda et al 2008(Suda et al , 2017, together with the latest data added manually, based on the following studies (Martin et al 2007;Koch et al 2008;Adén et al 2009;Feltzing et al 2009;Koch et al 2009;Frebel et al 2010;Norris et al 2010c, a, b;Adén et al 2011;Lai et al 2011;Simon et al 2011;Gilmore et al 2013;Koch et al 2013;Vargas et al 2013;Frebel et al 2014;Ishigaki et al 2014;Koch & Rich 2014;François et al 2016;Ji et al 2016b, d, c;Martin et al 2016;Roederer et al 2016;Hansen et al 2017;Kirby et al 2017;Venn et al 2017;Chiti et al 2018;Nagasawa et al 2018;Ji et al 2019b;Hansen et al 2020;Ji et al 2020). and S-UFDs, even if we compare stars with similar Fe abundances.…”
Section: Agb S-process Enrichment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for some stars, the possibility of pure r-process has already been eliminated (e.g. Car II, Ji et al 2020). We thus make a working assumption and place an empirical detection limit for [Eu/H] ∼ −3.5.…”
Section: No R-process Contribution To Ba and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation