40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &Amp; Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the experimental nature of their work prevent them from directly acquiring unsteady data in the separated flow field, thus limiting our comprehension of such flows. During the last ten years, several works have been devoted to the simulation of such a flow in order to improve turbulence model predictions or to validate new hybrid numerical approaches (see for example, Fureby, Nilsson & Andersson 1999;Forsythe et al 2002;Baurle et al 2003;Kawai & Fujii 2005). Unfortunately, these numerical studies have focused on time-averaged results and none of them has been used to assess the unsteadiness of the flow, except the study of Sandberg & Fasel (2006a, b) who investigated the transitional wake at Re D = 100 000 with D the diameter of the trailing edge, with the use of DNS and linear stability investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the experimental nature of their work prevent them from directly acquiring unsteady data in the separated flow field, thus limiting our comprehension of such flows. During the last ten years, several works have been devoted to the simulation of such a flow in order to improve turbulence model predictions or to validate new hybrid numerical approaches (see for example, Fureby, Nilsson & Andersson 1999;Forsythe et al 2002;Baurle et al 2003;Kawai & Fujii 2005). Unfortunately, these numerical studies have focused on time-averaged results and none of them has been used to assess the unsteadiness of the flow, except the study of Sandberg & Fasel (2006a, b) who investigated the transitional wake at Re D = 100 000 with D the diameter of the trailing edge, with the use of DNS and linear stability investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this region, there is a large 'hump' with the time-averaged Cp showing the best agreement with the flight test. This discrepancy has been observed in other fighter aircraft simulations and is typically due to the inability of the RANS turbulence models to accurately capture the effect of the massive separation and strong unsteady vortices [12,14,15,44,45]. …”
Section: F-16xlmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…CFD has its own limitations, of course, such as turbulence and transition modelling, to name a few. However, the large body of previous work [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] performed by researchers at the US Air Force Academy using the unstructured mesh solver Cobalt [19] coupled with a detached-eddy simulation (DES) turbulence treatment, adaptive mesh refinement, six degree of freedom (6 DOF) motion, and deforming grids for aero-elasticity has led to a high-fidelity capability for computing stability and control characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RANS models are widely used in industrial applications since they require relatively small computational resources due to the ensemble-averaging of the governing equations. While the RANS method models model all the turbulence scales, which often fail to provide accurate results for complex flows since the large turbulence scales for separated flows are strongly dependent on the geometry [14] .…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%