2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1070427206040057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desulfation of rare-earth concentrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being a recent area of interest, there is very limited information with regards to the processing details of rare earths on leaching of zirconosilicate minerals. Present literature are mainly commercial in nature and highlights only the generic process of treatment which either involves the use of sulphation baking 2 to convert rare earths in the zirconosilicate minerals into water soluble sulphates followed by water leaching or the use of weak sulphuric acid for direct leaching of Zr and RE values without the need for sulphation baking [13][14][15] . For example, pilot-plant recovery of rare earths from Greenland's Kvanefield eudialyte flotation concentrate involves leaching continuously for 5 h using weak sulphuric acid followed by strong acid leach for 4 h at 90-95⁰C with 354 kg/T (0.354g/g) acid and free acidity of 110 g/L with high RE recoveries but there is no details as to how the leaching factors affects RE dissolution [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being a recent area of interest, there is very limited information with regards to the processing details of rare earths on leaching of zirconosilicate minerals. Present literature are mainly commercial in nature and highlights only the generic process of treatment which either involves the use of sulphation baking 2 to convert rare earths in the zirconosilicate minerals into water soluble sulphates followed by water leaching or the use of weak sulphuric acid for direct leaching of Zr and RE values without the need for sulphation baking [13][14][15] . For example, pilot-plant recovery of rare earths from Greenland's Kvanefield eudialyte flotation concentrate involves leaching continuously for 5 h using weak sulphuric acid followed by strong acid leach for 4 h at 90-95⁰C with 354 kg/T (0.354g/g) acid and free acidity of 110 g/L with high RE recoveries but there is no details as to how the leaching factors affects RE dissolution [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) If cerium oxide, therefore, is converted into sodium cerium sulfate in Na 2 SO 4 H 2 SO 4 H 2 O solutions during the leaching-REPPW process, it would be one of the simpler separation methods because sodium cerium sulfate is poorly soluble under acidic conditions. 11) This simple method, aimed at sodium cerium sulfate (NaCe(SO 4 ) 2 ·H 2 O), has been applied in various fields.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge on the composition of the equilibrium phases formed in multicomponent systems, containing rare-earth sulfates is crucial for the application and optimization of sulfuric acid processing of rare earth concentrates [4][5][6]. The behaviour of the systems and especially the solubility of the different sulfates at ambient temperature (25 • C) and around 64 under the latter conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%