2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destructive and non-destructive density determination: method comparison and evaluation from the Laguna Potrok Aike sedimentary record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting images are displayed in a greyscale with the darker grey representing a lower X-ray attenuation (Boespflug et al 1995;Guyard et al 2007a). Greyscale values are expressed as CT numbers, which are complex units related to the mineralogy, organic matter content, grain size, and bulk density (e.g., Fortin et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting images are displayed in a greyscale with the darker grey representing a lower X-ray attenuation (Boespflug et al 1995;Guyard et al 2007a). Greyscale values are expressed as CT numbers, which are complex units related to the mineralogy, organic matter content, grain size, and bulk density (e.g., Fortin et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incident X-rays are attenuated by a wide range of phenomena, with grey levels acting as a measure of attenuation. Fortin et al (2013) show that sediment density may be calculated using radiographic data for each pixel. The latter is influenced by various factors such as sediment porosity, water content, composition (OM, biogenic silica, mineralogy), and grain size (St-Onge et al, 2007).…”
Section: Carbon Stock Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of the sediment is partly dependent on the carbonate content, but carbonate content influence on the density depends also on the density of the other components of the sediment (Reghellin et al, 2013), so that it was not possible to accurately infer density variations from the changes in the 15 carbonate content alone. Attempts to estimate density from other sedimentary variables based on existing calibrations (Dadey et al, 1992;Weber et al, 1997;Fortin et al, 2013) were not successful. Unassessed changes of sediment density are therefore likely to introduce uncertainty for many records, although the largest and most systematic change is likely to be the long-term increasing trend caused by compaction, which is addressed by the long-term trend correction.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%