2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destruction of Cell Topography, Morphology, Membrane, Inhibition of Respiration, Biofilm Formation, and Bioactive Molecule Production by Nanoparticles of Ag, ZnO, CuO, TiO2, and Al2O3 toward Beneficial Soil Bacteria

Abstract: The unregulated discharge of nanoparticles (NPs) from various nanotechnology industries into the environment is expected to alter the composition and physiological functions of soil microbiota. Considering this knowledge gap, the impact of five NPs (Ag, ZnO, CuO, Al2O3, and TiO2) differing in size and morphology on growth behavior and physiological activity of Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus thuringiensis, Pseudomonas mosselii, and Sinorhizobium meliloti were investigated. Various biochemical and microscopic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To differentiate between viable and dead cell fluorescence, cells were stained with PI. Metabolically active cells with intact cell membranes do not selectively take up PI; rather, it is taken up by membrane-compromised cells [ 73 ]. Similar observations have been made for viable and dead cells of Bacillus subtilis in a pesticide-contaminated environment [ 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To differentiate between viable and dead cell fluorescence, cells were stained with PI. Metabolically active cells with intact cell membranes do not selectively take up PI; rather, it is taken up by membrane-compromised cells [ 73 ]. Similar observations have been made for viable and dead cells of Bacillus subtilis in a pesticide-contaminated environment [ 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These delivery systems can be regulated for single goals or multiple combinations viz; spatially target release, time-controlled release, remotely or self-regulated release to overcome the biological barriers in the successful target [ 21 , 58 60 ]. However, the efficacy of nanoencapsulation or nanocarriers is (1) to prevent pre-degradation of AI in the carrier before their release in the target (2) to improve penetration and ease solubility of AIs within the target site (3) to monitor or regulate the degradation of AIs in the desired site [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Nanoformulations As a Promising Tool In An Agricultural Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanopesticides are also showing some adverse effects on crop plants directly or indirectly. The most favorable and used AgNPs and their complex nanoparticle have been attributed to their diverse range in each class of pesticides due to low toxicity but still many reported published that explained the drawback of these smart nanoagrochemicals [ 61 , 140 , 141 ] (Table 4 ). For example, In Vicia faba , the AgNPs internalization in leaves can abrupt the stomatal conductance CO 2 assimilation rate and photosystem II [ 142 ].…”
Section: Drawbacks Using Nanoagrochemicals On Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…prevention and treatment Biofilms protect microbial cells from serious ecological situations, such as the toxicity of metals, ultraviolet introduction, lack of hydration and saltiness, acid exposure, and anti-toxins or other antimicrobial operators just as phagocytosis (Ahmed et al, 2020). The essential problem with bacterial biofilm infections is affinity to clearance of resistance by antimicrobial agents and host immune system when compared to their free (planktonic) partners.…”
Section: Biofilm-associated Infections Of S Epidermidismentioning
confidence: 99%