2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destabilizing effects of the suprathermal populations in the solar wind

Abstract: Context. Suprathermal populations are ubiquitous in the solar wind, indicating plasma states out of thermal equilibrium, and an excess of free energy expected to enhance the kinetic instabilities. However, recent endeavors to disclose the effects of these populations on the electromagnetic instabilities driven by the temperature anisotropy do not confirm this expectation, but mainly show that these instabilities are inhibited by the suprathermals. Aims. In an attempt to clarify the effect of the suprathermals,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variations are indeed confirmed by the observations in Fig. 3, and they come to provide an important observational support for the recent studies (Lazar et al, 2015b) which suggest that Kappa modelling of the plasma particles and their kinetic effects in the solar wind must consider a κ-dependent temperature, increasing with decreasing the κ-index.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variations are indeed confirmed by the observations in Fig. 3, and they come to provide an important observational support for the recent studies (Lazar et al, 2015b) which suggest that Kappa modelling of the plasma particles and their kinetic effects in the solar wind must consider a κ-dependent temperature, increasing with decreasing the κ-index.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The core show a modest increase of both the temperature components with the κ-index, while the halo seems to compensate, exhibiting a very clear decrease of the parallel and perpendicular temperatures with increasing κ. These evolutions of the halo temperatures appear to be in perfect agreement with the recent theoretical studies (Lazar et al, 2015b), which indicate an increase of the Kappa temperature with a decrease of κ, i.e., an enhance of suprathermal populations, rather than a κ-independent temperature (Livadiotis and McComas, 2013). An increase of T h with decreasing κ is also in accord with the radial profiles of these two quantities provided by our analysis above.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis: Halo Vs Coresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In their study the WI growth rates were found to decrease with increasing the electron suprathermal population as a result of a different Kappa approach with a κ−independent temperature that recently was proven inappropriate for such an analysis . More results on the kinetic instabilities using approaches with a κ−dependent temperature, as used in the present paper, can be found in Schupfer (2000, 2001); Lazar et al (2015), and Shaaban et al (2016).…”
Section: Solar Wind Protons Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suprathermals enhance the electron temperature, and implicitly the plasma beta parameter Schupfer 2000, 2001;Lazar et al 2015) T K e, ,⊥ = 2κ e 2κ e − 3 T M e, ,⊥ > T M e, ,⊥ , β K e, ,⊥ = 2κ e 2κ e − 3 β e, ,⊥ > β e, ,⊥ ,…”
Section: Appendix A: Distributions and Dispersion Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) κ-functions with a locally best-fitting Kappa index κ = κ(r) that develops from high κ-values higher than 10 at 1 AU (i.e., quasi-Maxwellian limit) and decrease in different forms dependent on the effectiveness of the velocity-space diffusion, to systematically lower κ-values (asymptotically approaching κ = 1, 5, i.e., v −5 power-law distributions). This may express how far the range of Kappa values covered at the evolution of the solar wind ion distribution function extends outward from the corona to the termination shock and what it means in terms of κ = κ(r) (for a basic interpretation of what this means in terms of a non-equilibrium state see, e.g., Lazar et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%