2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.1629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DesR349P Mutation Results in Ultrastructural Disruptions and Compromise of Skeletal Muscle Biomechanics Already at Preclinical Stages in Young Mice before the Onset of Protein Aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1), ML and especially DL are severely limited due to overfitting. Based on the identified associations of the same priors with the investigated labels in previous studies 5, 13, 35, 36 , we hypothesize that our muscle-specific learning tasks are related and the mean predictive performance over all tasks may assist SEMPAI to select a regularized model. Therefore, a total meta-loss is introduced, which is a weighted sum of all meta-losses for each task and provides an estimate of the model performance over all tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1), ML and especially DL are severely limited due to overfitting. Based on the identified associations of the same priors with the investigated labels in previous studies 5, 13, 35, 36 , we hypothesize that our muscle-specific learning tasks are related and the mean predictive performance over all tasks may assist SEMPAI to select a regularized model. Therefore, a total meta-loss is introduced, which is a weighted sum of all meta-losses for each task and provides an estimate of the model performance over all tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In brief, these features include the cosine angle sum (CAS) taken from selected 2D planes (2D-CAS) and in 3D (3D-CAS), the vernier density (VD), the 3D sarcomere length (3D-SL), and the crosssectional area (CSA) of single fibers. Since these features have already been shown to be descriptive for a variety of rather specific remodeling patterns in muscle research, related to aging, chronic degenerative or inflammatory myopathies 5, 13, 35, 36 , we use them as prior information, and term them accordingly as priors . A more elaborate explanation of the extraction of priors is given in the Methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 46 ] In brief, these features include the cosine angle sum (CAS) taken from selected 2D planes (2D‐CAS) and in 3D (3D‐CAS), the vernier density (VD), the 3D sarcomere length (3D‐SL), and the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of single fibers. Since these features have already been shown to be descriptive for a variety of rather specific remodeling patterns in muscle research, related to aging, chronic degenerative or inflammatory myopathies, [ 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 ] we use them as priors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tasks with small data, i.e., pCa50 and passive force (Table 2 in the next Section 2.2), ML and especially DL are severely limited due to overfitting. Based on the identified associations of the same priors with the investigated labels in previous studies, [30][31][32][33][34] we hypothesize that muscle-specific learning tasks are related and the mean predictive performance over all tasks may assist SEMPAI to select an even more regularized model. Therefore, a total meta-loss is introduced, which is a weighted sum of all metalosses for each task and provides an estimate of the model performance over all tasks.…”
Section: Sempai Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 93%