2014
DOI: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00435.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desperately Seeking Systems Thinking in ICT4D

Abstract: The ICT4D context is a complex, multi‐faceted one that needs to take into account political, cultural, economic and infrastructural factors, which often prove to be more challenging to deal with than the technological aspects. This messy context may benefit from a systems approach: Systems thinking provides a holistic view and transdisciplinary methods to describe and analyse complex situations. But to what extent has ICT4D benefited from systems thinking in the past? This paper presents a literature survey of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a common assumption, again contrary to experience relating to both public and private sector organisations in highly development economies, that only the documented, formal information system need be considered. In practice this often has limited relevance for the effective information system, which can only be understood by detailed observation and analysis (‘Soft Systems Analysis’ [ 13 ] is commonly used in the private sector for this purpose). There seems a serious risk that rather than reforming health information systems in ways that encourage improved policy making and hence better health outcomes, ICT innovations may improve some technical aspects of data availability, timeliness or quality, while failing to address inherent weaknesses in the overall system whereby information feeds into the policy making process [ 14 ].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a common assumption, again contrary to experience relating to both public and private sector organisations in highly development economies, that only the documented, formal information system need be considered. In practice this often has limited relevance for the effective information system, which can only be understood by detailed observation and analysis (‘Soft Systems Analysis’ [ 13 ] is commonly used in the private sector for this purpose). There seems a serious risk that rather than reforming health information systems in ways that encourage improved policy making and hence better health outcomes, ICT innovations may improve some technical aspects of data availability, timeliness or quality, while failing to address inherent weaknesses in the overall system whereby information feeds into the policy making process [ 14 ].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A system may also be a subjective mental construct that depends on the observer's viewpoint, which defines the system's boundary to limit its function and purpose [1], [34]. A system's structure is derived from repeated events or patterns described through stakeholders' mental models [8] -that is, the implicit structures of assumptions and meanings, preconceived ideas, values, beliefs, and personal philosophies of individuals and in groups that act as the inner rules of causal relationships.…”
Section: Systems Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems thinking focuses on the whole system to study its structures and behaviours to understand better how the deep roots of complex behaviours adjust their outcomes. Systems thinking recognises the importance of feedback mechanisms in the system [8], [34], [38]. Identifying the patterns and interrelationships can help to solve complex problems.…”
Section: Systems Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is widespread agreement in ICT4D research on the importance of context (Andoh‐Baidoo, ), for instance, the way in which the outcome of ICT4D projects is influenced by the interests of stakeholder groups (Bailur, ); by developmental goals (Prakash & De, ); by local language and culture (Sinha & Hyma, ), etc. Conversely, lack of engagement with context is a criticism of some ICT4D research and practice (Dodson, Sterling, & Bennett, ; Turpin & Alexander, ). Critical realism can help address these contextual issues: it requires an investigation of context because context is represented by the domain of the real.…”
Section: Critical Realism and Ict4d Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%