2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desorption of Amphotericin B from Mixed Monolayers with Cholesterol at the Air/Water Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mixtures with a higher proportion of AmB (>50%), the collapse pressure values cannot be exactly evaluated due to the dissolution of AmB in the subphase. 28,29 The above-mentioned phase transition can be more clearly seen in the plots of the compressional modulus as a function of the surface pressure (inset of Figure 3). A characteristic minimum (M) can be clearly seen in the C s -1 -π curves, which is equivalent to the pseudoplateau recorded in the π-A isotherms at 21 mN/m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For mixtures with a higher proportion of AmB (>50%), the collapse pressure values cannot be exactly evaluated due to the dissolution of AmB in the subphase. 28,29 The above-mentioned phase transition can be more clearly seen in the plots of the compressional modulus as a function of the surface pressure (inset of Figure 3). A characteristic minimum (M) can be clearly seen in the C s -1 -π curves, which is equivalent to the pseudoplateau recorded in the π-A isotherms at 21 mN/m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, at π ) 30 mN/m, both the additivity of the molecular areas and the nearly constant values of the transition surface pressures (Table 1) indicate the immiscibility between AmB and DPPC under these conditions, although in this situation the values for the molecular area of AmB are uncertain, due to the instability of the AmB monolayer. 51- 53 On the other hand, at surface pressures below that for the transition M, the existence of attractive interactions might be expected, due to the formation of the 2:1 (AmB/ DPPC) complex that could provoke the condensation of the film components at the surface and thus the occurrence of negative deviations from ideal behavior. However, the experimental results (Figure 8) show the existence of positive deviations.…”
Section: Miscibility Of the Complex With An Excess Of Particular Compmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During the compression of the monomolecular layer of AmB and AmB–Cu 2+ , the organization of the molecules on the surface is altered, which is manifested in the occurrence of a characteristic broad plateau. The presence of the plateau is interpreted as progressive changes in the orientation of AmB molecules caused by compression from the horizontal in an expanded state to vertical position in a liquid-condensed phase and also desorption of molecules from the surface. It was confirmed that this plateau transition depends on temperature, and the surface pressure value of it decreases with increasing temperature . As for the parental molecule AmB, the AmB–Cu 2+ complex could assume two different positions at the interface, depending on the orientation of its long polyene axis: parallel to the interface or perpendicular to it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our opinion, the negative deviations in the case of AmB are not due to a condensation and intermolecular attractions, but are rather caused by the expelling of molecules from monolayer during reorientation process, which leads to a reduction in the mean area per molecule. Effectively, at π > 5 mN/m, AmB molecules were to be found in the oblique form, and some of the hydrogen bonds were broken, facilitating desorption of antibiotic from the interface . For the higher surface pressure value (15 mN/m), only a slight negative deviation from ideality was noted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation