2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desorption kinetics of tetracyclines in soils assessed by diffusive gradients in thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been successfully used for studying exchange kinetics of metals and nutrients and to interpret DGT measurements in soils and sediments in terms of labile pool size and resupply kinetic parameters. Only two studies have been published, using DGT and the DIFS model for organic compounds and both of them investigated antibiotics in soils. , These studies on inorganics and antibiotics lay the foundation for our use of DGT to assess pesticide availability, resupply kinetics and labile pool size in soils and sediments. Depending on the scientific questions and objectives, environmentally realistic and elevated concentrations can be studied with DGT, either in field soils brought to the laboratory or in spiked systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been successfully used for studying exchange kinetics of metals and nutrients and to interpret DGT measurements in soils and sediments in terms of labile pool size and resupply kinetic parameters. Only two studies have been published, using DGT and the DIFS model for organic compounds and both of them investigated antibiotics in soils. , These studies on inorganics and antibiotics lay the foundation for our use of DGT to assess pesticide availability, resupply kinetics and labile pool size in soils and sediments. Depending on the scientific questions and objectives, environmentally realistic and elevated concentrations can be studied with DGT, either in field soils brought to the laboratory or in spiked systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the individual PFAS, the minimum C DGT values were found for soil D after 480 h, while the maximum values were in soil A after 10 h. The resulting R (C DGT /C d ) is an important indicator of the extent of analyte depletion at the DGT interface. All R values were higher than 0.1 (except PFBA and PFOA in soil C at 360 h) but less than 0.95, similar to other chemicals, such as antibiotics, 29,33 bisphenols, 53 and pesticides, 54 again suggesting that PFAS in soil solution was only partially resupplied by the solid phase because a fully sustained case would result in R close to 1. At a given time, the R values tended to be in this order: PFOS > PFOA > PFHxA ≈ PFBS > PFBA, regardless of soil type.…”
Section: Uptake and Measurement Of Pfas By Dgtmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, they are in the lower range of available k −1 values (from 2.3 × 10 −6 to 2.3 × 10 −4 s −1 ) for other organics (antibiotics and bisphenols) in soils with the DGT method. 29,33,53 For soils A and D, k −1 decreased with an increasing perfluorinated chain length for PFCAs and PFSAs, respectively, implying that, for PFAS with short chain lengths, there are more significant kinetic limitations for their release from the solid phase into the solution phase in soils. This is again consistent with a recent field study for PFAS.…”
Section: Lability and Release Kinetics Of Pfas In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations