1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1128::aid-cncr11>3.3.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desmoplastic and desmoplastic neurotropic melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
173
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
173
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] Although desmoplastic melanoma was first characterized in the medical literature in 1971, 2 only recently (2004) has the concept of two morphological subtypes been put forth. 20 Owing to the rarity of desmoplastic melanomas in general and this nascent classification system, the relative incidence of the two subtypes is not well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Although desmoplastic melanoma was first characterized in the medical literature in 1971, 2 only recently (2004) has the concept of two morphological subtypes been put forth. 20 Owing to the rarity of desmoplastic melanomas in general and this nascent classification system, the relative incidence of the two subtypes is not well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 9% of patients diagnosed with desmoplastic melanoma (n ϭ 28), 96% (n ϭ 27) had neurotropism. Even though the presence of neurotropism has been believed to be a risk factor for early recurrence, 16 the 5-year OS rate in the desmoplastic neurotropic subgroup was 70%. The median OS had not been reached in the desmoplastic neurotropic subgroup at the time of last follow-up, but it exceeded 6.0 years.…”
Section: Tumor Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. It is more common in males and the most common sites of involvement are sun‐exposed skin surfaces of the head and neck, followed by the extremities and trunk 2, 3, 4. These lesions can often be difficult to differentiate from other benign and malignant neoplasms, potentially leading to inaccurate diagnosis and inadequate treatment 5, 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions can often be difficult to differentiate from other benign and malignant neoplasms, potentially leading to inaccurate diagnosis and inadequate treatment 5, 6. Historical local recurrence rates (LRRs) for patients with DM are in the range of 20–50% 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, though recent series have suggested potentially lower rates in selected patients (negative margins, non‐head and neck location, lack of perineural invasion, decreasing Breslow depth, etc.) 9, 10, 11, 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%