2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04275-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desmoid-type fibromatosis: imaging features and course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound, CT, and MRI are the main diagnostic tools for DF, with CT being the preferred diagnostic and postoperative follow-up tool for intra-abdominal DF (14). The appearance of DF tissue varies depending on its composition (15). On CT scans, DF typically appears as an expansile, homogeneous or heterogeneously enhancing mass, often exhibiting calcifications (14).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound, CT, and MRI are the main diagnostic tools for DF, with CT being the preferred diagnostic and postoperative follow-up tool for intra-abdominal DF (14). The appearance of DF tissue varies depending on its composition (15). On CT scans, DF typically appears as an expansile, homogeneous or heterogeneously enhancing mass, often exhibiting calcifications (14).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decisions should be based on at least two additional evaluations and generally do not apply within the first year of diagnosis. This is due to the potential for EADTF to undergo spontaneous regression after initial advancement [80,81]. Nevertheless, if the tumor is located adjacent to a vital anatomical structure that could significantly increase morbidity, it may be appropriate to consider proactive treatment earlier to mitigate the potential risk of morbidity before the disease stabilizes [74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Estimation of the degree of fibrosis through a semi-quantitative fibrosis score was based on the visual assessment of the percentage of low signal intensity areas on T2-weighted images within the tumor using adjacent normal muscle as reference. 18 An original scoring system was developed to analyze the importance of fibrosis modification during therapy, from 1 to 4, defined as percentage of fibrosis modification within the tumor, which frequently corresponds to a favorable response to therapy: 19 1= 0 to 25%, 2= 26 to 50%, 3= 51 to 75% and 4= > 75% respectively of tumor surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%