2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-10675-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deskriptive Statistik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18 ] While the construction of a sum score out of Likert scale items can be viewed critically, some authors think this is possible if the single items are rated equally and the distance between the single scores is visualized with equal lengths (as we did in the ImpactQ). [ 19 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 18 ] While the construction of a sum score out of Likert scale items can be viewed critically, some authors think this is possible if the single items are rated equally and the distance between the single scores is visualized with equal lengths (as we did in the ImpactQ). [ 19 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Data obtained from Likert Scales can be interpreted as metric (used as quasi‐metric) variables if only “end points” are labeled which are the exact opposite of each other (with 0 indicating the lowest expression). The naming of categories, on the other hand, would take away the element of intuitively selecting an answer within a standardized array of equally distant choices (Carifio & Perla, 2007 ; Nardi, 2003 ; Urban & Mayerl, 2011 ; Völkl & Korb, 2018 ). Our variable was coded from 0 (no impact) to 5 (severe impact) and fulfills the respective requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%