Abstract:What are the desired outcomes of an undergraduate education in psychology? It is vital to identify the desired outcomes that benefit departments, students, and society, because the pursuit of these goals helps psychology educators achieve the best possible learning experience for their students. When psychology educators meet their instructional and educational goals in a high school, community college, college or university setting, knowledge of psychology and human behavior adds richness to the fabric of soc… Show more
“…The psychology assessment evaluation rubric focused primarily on content, but we also wanted an instrument that would align to other outcomes in the Guidelines 2.0 (Bernstein et al, 2010; Fulks, 2004; Landrum et al, 2010; Richmond et al, 2016). The working group wanted the rubric to reflect universal designs for learning (CAST, 2018); in that, it had to allow for the evaluation of various types of student engagement, mode of response, and student abilities.…”
Although many psychology departments and instructors are aware of the American Psychological Association Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major Version 2.0, they are often less aware of the means by which to assess student mastery of the recommended goals. Our purpose is to discuss general principles for assessment, offer a psychology learner taxonomy that aligns with Goal 1 of the Guidelines 2.0, and present a rubric for reviewing assessments. Goal 1 of the Guidelines 2.0 is based on content knowledge in psychology. Whereas most assessments allow for the measure of the mastery of content to different extents, the results of those assessments can be invalid due to the design or inappropriate use of the rubric. The working group at the Summit on National Assessment of Psychology addressed these issues and curated evidence-informed assessment exemplars designed to measure content knowledge in psychology.
“…The psychology assessment evaluation rubric focused primarily on content, but we also wanted an instrument that would align to other outcomes in the Guidelines 2.0 (Bernstein et al, 2010; Fulks, 2004; Landrum et al, 2010; Richmond et al, 2016). The working group wanted the rubric to reflect universal designs for learning (CAST, 2018); in that, it had to allow for the evaluation of various types of student engagement, mode of response, and student abilities.…”
Although many psychology departments and instructors are aware of the American Psychological Association Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major Version 2.0, they are often less aware of the means by which to assess student mastery of the recommended goals. Our purpose is to discuss general principles for assessment, offer a psychology learner taxonomy that aligns with Goal 1 of the Guidelines 2.0, and present a rubric for reviewing assessments. Goal 1 of the Guidelines 2.0 is based on content knowledge in psychology. Whereas most assessments allow for the measure of the mastery of content to different extents, the results of those assessments can be invalid due to the design or inappropriate use of the rubric. The working group at the Summit on National Assessment of Psychology addressed these issues and curated evidence-informed assessment exemplars designed to measure content knowledge in psychology.
“…She coauthored a text (Carducci & Van Kirk, 2011), The Psychology Major Career Preparation Workbook: Planning Your Career Success , which highlights the soft skill sets acquired from being psychology majors. She was an attendee at the University of Puget Sound for the National Conference on Undergraduate Education in Psychology working with others on making clear the desired outcomes of an undergraduate education in psychology (Landrum et al, 2010).…”
Section: Wayne Weiten Teaching Excellence Awardmentioning
“…Introductory psychology is the second most popular course in many college curricula serving as both the foundation for the major and a prerequisite for a liberal arts undergraduate education (Gurung et al, 2016). In addition, Landrum et al (2010) wrote, Psychology educators need to ensure that students are acquiring sensitivity for and appreciation of sociocultural and international diversity for interpersonal success and possess the ability to function effectively in a global society. Psychology students need to know that, regardless of the boundaries between countries and cultures, exposure to different perspectives helps individuals to understand multiple approaches to investigating and explaining behavior, sometimes depending on cultural context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of culture is particularly important for universities with populations that are predominantly students of color. As pointed out by Landrum et al (2010), the cultural context may help individuals understand multiple approaches to investigating and explaining human behavior. We believe this to be true for teachers of psychology as well as their students.…”
The present study describes a culturally relevant approach to introductory psychology textbook selection for students attending a historically Black college/university (HBCU). The following multistage procedure was used: (1) a survey of HBCU psychology departments was conducted to ascertain how they selected their introductory psychology textbooks; (2) a review of the literature on introductory psychology textbook selection was performed to identify criteria; and (3) rating criteria were developed; used in the actual selection of a textbook for HBCU students; and were subjected to psychometric analysis. The psychometric analyses of 240 ratings (10 criteria X 4 raters X 6 books) involved both reliability assessment of the scale with the selection criteria as items and interrater reliability in evaluating introductory psychology textbooks. The survey of HBCU faculty yielded no consensus or systematic process from the respondents. Both internal consistency reliability and agreement among faculty were adequate on the rating instrument for the total scores and subscale scores of Quality of Learning Resources and Learning and Comprehension. However, the subscale scores for Cultural Relevance yielded mixed results by type of reliability: Interrater agreement was adequate but internal consistency reliability was poor. Future research using multiple methodologies must address the relevancy of cultural diversity for introductory psychology courses
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.