2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-022-09883-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desirability relations in Savage’s model of decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our setup, this would mean that each player t has a (possibly misspecified) set of models Q t ⊆ ∆ o . A strategy profile σ ∈ Σ is a Berk-Nash equilibrium if and only if there exists a profile of beliefs β ∈ ∆ T such that the set of all players that satisfy the following two conditions has full measure: 30 1. u t (σ (t) , β (t)) ≥ u t (a, β (t)) for all a ∈ A;…”
Section: Berk-nash Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our setup, this would mean that each player t has a (possibly misspecified) set of models Q t ⊆ ∆ o . A strategy profile σ ∈ Σ is a Berk-Nash equilibrium if and only if there exists a profile of beliefs β ∈ ∆ T such that the set of all players that satisfy the following two conditions has full measure: 30 1. u t (σ (t) , β (t)) ≥ u t (a, β (t)) for all a ∈ A;…”
Section: Berk-nash Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these specifications, D φ satisfies (10) and it is jointly convex and continuous. 30 Compared to Esponda and Pouzo [12], we do not assume that players' are expected utility and have a prior µ over argmin z∈Qt K (λ σ ||z). In other words, players are only allowed to consider degenerate priors.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%