2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desipramine potentiation of the acute depressant effects of ethanol: Modulation by α2-adrenoreceptors and stress

Abstract: Ethanol exerts effects on the brain noradrenergic system, and these are thought to contribute to the sedative/hypnotic (depressant) effects of ethanol. Recent studies suggest that the norepinephrine transporter (NET) plays an important role in modulating ethanol's depressant effects. The aim of the present study was to further characterize this role. Transporter blockers with varying affinity for NET versus the serotonin transporter (desipramine>fluoxetine>citalopram) were tested for their ability to alter eth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the effect of a NET inhibitor on ethanol-induced sensitization. A previous study reported that desipramine (30 mg/kg), but not fluoxetine, potentiates the acute hypnotic/sedative effect of ethanol (3.0 g/kg) in mice and that this effect may be mediated via a2-adrenoreceptor (Boyce-Rustay et al, 2008). We provide evidence that fluoxetine has opposite effects depending on sensitization phases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the effect of a NET inhibitor on ethanol-induced sensitization. A previous study reported that desipramine (30 mg/kg), but not fluoxetine, potentiates the acute hypnotic/sedative effect of ethanol (3.0 g/kg) in mice and that this effect may be mediated via a2-adrenoreceptor (Boyce-Rustay et al, 2008). We provide evidence that fluoxetine has opposite effects depending on sensitization phases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, blockade of NE reuptake with desmethylimipramine (DMI) has long been known to produce hypoactivity in rodents which might be the result of stimulation of postsynaptic α 2 -receptors in forebrain regions by endogenous NE. In agreement, we and others recently found that prior blockade of these receptors with systemic atipamezole in mice attenuates the hypoactivity in mice in the open field after DMI as well as enhances Fos expression throughout the neocortex (Boyce-Rustay et al 2008; Stone, EA and Lin, Y, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Mechanisms For Neural and Behavioral Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In present study, the enhancement of HO-1 expression by desipramine could be regulated by ERK and JNK, but the effect of fluoxetine was only regulated by JNK. Moreover, it has also been reported that the difference in potency between desipramine and fluoxetine exerts in many functions, such as inhibition of chemotaxis on polymorphonuclear leukocytes [79], acute hypnotic/sedative effect of ethanol [80] and development of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization [81]. Our results reveal that desipramine-enhanced HO-1 expression sustains to 24 h, however, fluoxetine-increased HO-1 expression reaches a peak at 8 h. Our results and previous reports indicate that different types of antidepressant exert different molecular mechanisms which could provide a novel view for clinical drug choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%