1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.1989.tb00463.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designs to Balance the Effect of Order of Presentation and First‐order Carry‐over Effects in Hall Tests

Abstract: The problem of balancing out the effect of order of presentation and the carryover effect of a preceding sample over a series of presentations of the same set of samples is addressed. A series of designs developed by Williams (1949) are used. The method of calculation is given. Tables containing about 50 consumers of each design for presenting from 4 through to I6 samples are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
892
0
93

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,546 publications
(989 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
892
0
93
Order By: Relevance
“…All fat and connective tissue was trimmed and the muscle cut into blocks of 2 cm 3 , which were wrapped in pre-labelled foils and placed in a heated incubator until given to the assessors. Samples were tasted in an order based on the designs outlined by MacFie et al (1989) for balancing carryover effects between samples. Thus, each panelList received 6 samples in a session, randomised by the sensory panel software, in a different order for each panellist.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All fat and connective tissue was trimmed and the muscle cut into blocks of 2 cm 3 , which were wrapped in pre-labelled foils and placed in a heated incubator until given to the assessors. Samples were tasted in an order based on the designs outlined by MacFie et al (1989) for balancing carryover effects between samples. Thus, each panelList received 6 samples in a session, randomised by the sensory panel software, in a different order for each panellist.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this assessment, a 9-centimeter non-structured linear scale anchored with ''none" or ''weak", and ''strong" or "high", depending on the attribute, was used. The samples were presented monadically to the panelists in a balanced complete block design (MacFie et al, 1989). According to their discriminatory (p ≤ 0.50) and repeatability capacity (p ˃ 0.05) (Damasio & Costell, 1991), twelve out of the fifteen panelists were selected to make up the final QDA team.…”
Section: Training and Final Panelist Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freitas; Dutra; Bolini The samples were presented in a balanced block design (Macfie et al, 1989) in plastic disposable cups coded with a three-digit number. The tests were conducted in individual booths at the Sensory Analysis Laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%