1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90244-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designs of bond strength tests for metal-ceramic complexes: Review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
71
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
71
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The feldspathic ceramic-Au-Pd alloy combination presented statistically higher mean values than those of the other two low-fusing ceramic (Super Porcelain Ti-22 and Vita Titankeramik)-cpTi combinations. This finding is in agreement with several other studies [17,20,27] where also better outcomes were observed with utilization of noble alloys compared to other alloys. Interestingly however, Triceram-cpTi combination presented non-significant results from the ceramic-Au-Pd combination in non-aged conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The feldspathic ceramic-Au-Pd alloy combination presented statistically higher mean values than those of the other two low-fusing ceramic (Super Porcelain Ti-22 and Vita Titankeramik)-cpTi combinations. This finding is in agreement with several other studies [17,20,27] where also better outcomes were observed with utilization of noble alloys compared to other alloys. Interestingly however, Triceram-cpTi combination presented non-significant results from the ceramic-Au-Pd combination in non-aged conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several authors considered the shear test as the most adequate method to measure bond between the metal and ceramics [2,8,11,26,31,32]. However other authors [10,12,17,20,33,34] suggest the threepoint-flexure test, four-point-flexure test [28] or biaxial flexure test [1]. The shear test used was highly reliable, because it is based on minimal experimental variables and creates less residual stress at metal-ceramic interface, where the oblique forces are also minimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although various types of tests have been described in the literature to evaluate metal-ceramic bond strength (20), there is no methodology capable of directly measuring the shear forces along the metal/ceramic interface (21), since the specimens have residual thermal stresses at the interface due to a mismatch of the CTE of ceramic and metal (23). Considering the methodology of the present study, there was a predominance of mixed failures in the groups P700 and U700, while adhesive failures were more noted in groups P400 and U400 (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several tests have been designed and selected by researchers to evaluate the metal-ceramic bond strength (20,21). ISO standard 9693:1999/Amd.1:2005 employs a 3-point bending test and the minimum acceptable bond strength with this test is 25 MPa (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%