2016
DOI: 10.3233/ip-160400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing visualization software for super-wicked problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core model structure was discussed and agreed upon during these meetings. Overall, the best practices recognized in the field were adhered to during this research (Martinez‐Moyano and Richardson, ; see also Winters et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The core model structure was discussed and agreed upon during these meetings. Overall, the best practices recognized in the field were adhered to during this research (Martinez‐Moyano and Richardson, ; see also Winters et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relatively recent addition of super wicked problems (Winters et al , 2016) to the distinction between tame and wicked problems (Head, 2008) arises out of the growing concern for a set of issues which are: controversial, imminently threatening, possess a global reach, impact the haves and have nots and require public leadership (Edmonstone et al , 2019). The addition of super wicked problems to the tame/wicked distinction generates the wicked problem continuum.…”
Section: The Wicked Problem Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication among technical experts and stakeholders is especially important for a class of issues termed "wicked problems" (Rittel and Webber, 1973), where both the benefits and costs have considerable societal impacts. Poor communication among technical experts and stakeholders may be attributed, in part, to the differences in performance criteria and rewards systems of the two groups in their respective employment sectors [see, for example, Winters et al (2016)]. For example, technical experts in academia are expected to publish new tools and methods, yet they are rarely rewarded based on the usability of a particular tool they create (Yarime et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%