2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: Evaluation of preference-elicitation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of ratings in content-based and collaborative filtering approaches results in the incomplete user profile and the new user problem [15]. Such approaches as multi-attribute utility theory allow the user to evaluate only a few items based on some criteria to get the overall representation of preferences.…”
Section: Content-based Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of ratings in content-based and collaborative filtering approaches results in the incomplete user profile and the new user problem [15]. Such approaches as multi-attribute utility theory allow the user to evaluate only a few items based on some criteria to get the overall representation of preferences.…”
Section: Content-based Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches as multi-attribute utility theory allow the user to evaluate only a few items based on some criteria to get the overall representation of preferences. Huang [15] followed this approach in order to construct a utility-based recommender system. The main problems were to minimise the effort of the user at the stage of weighting the importance of attributes for the utility function (usually created via multiple regression analysis, artificial neural networks, etc.)…”
Section: Content-based Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method develops a utility function based on the decision maker's preference structure, and the utility function is used to find optimal solution (Sanayei, Mousavi, Abdi, & Mohaghar, 2008). Huang (2011) states that MAUT is a quantitative method which has an orderly process to identify and analyse multiple variables to find a solution. By applying the developed MAU (multi-attribute utility) function a decision maker can find the utility of every alternative, to identify the alternative with highest utility to select.…”
Section: Multi-attribute Utility Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different utility elicitation methods are developed to find decision maker's MAU function, which can be a holistic approach such as a multiple regression analysis or a decomposed approach (Huang, 2011). Sensitivity analysis is a part of MAUT procedure (Min, 1994).…”
Section: Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Utility-based recommender systems make recommendations based on the computation of the utility of each item for the user. Utility-based recommendation techniques use features of items as background data, adduce utility functions over items for users to describe user liking, and apply the function to determine the rank of items for a user [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%