Drainage VIII, 21-24 March 2004
DOI: 10.13031/2013.15745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Two-Stage Agricultural Drainage Ditches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depth of a conventional drainage ditch is usually designed to carry a flow with a recurrence interval from 5 to 100years. 5 The trapezoidal shape of conventional drainage ditches can result in an over-widened channel bottom. 6 A wide channel bottom greatly reduces flow velocity in the channel during low flow conditions, which leads to sediment aggradation.…”
Section: Conventional Vs Two-stage Ditchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The depth of a conventional drainage ditch is usually designed to carry a flow with a recurrence interval from 5 to 100years. 5 The trapezoidal shape of conventional drainage ditches can result in an over-widened channel bottom. 6 A wide channel bottom greatly reduces flow velocity in the channel during low flow conditions, which leads to sediment aggradation.…”
Section: Conventional Vs Two-stage Ditchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,13,14 Improved fish habitat is expected because of improved sediment sorting, with fine materials either carried away by the low-flow channel or deposited on the benches, and coarse materials are allowed to settle in the channel bed, as well as the presence of deeper water during low-flow periods. 5,11,14 The main value of a two-stage ditch is increased stability in the ditch system. This is mainly embodied in reduced ditch cleanout costs associated with sediment deposition.…”
Section: Conventional Vs Two-stage Ditchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations