1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.1997.638376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing to control flight crew errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using automation, tasks should first be allocated based on what humans naturally excel at. The pilot should remain more involved in actions which have higher consequences on the overall mission (Schutte & Willshire, 1997). Time constrained, tedious, repetitive, deterministic, or precise actions should be automated.…”
Section: Automation For Human Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When using automation, tasks should first be allocated based on what humans naturally excel at. The pilot should remain more involved in actions which have higher consequences on the overall mission (Schutte & Willshire, 1997). Time constrained, tedious, repetitive, deterministic, or precise actions should be automated.…”
Section: Automation For Human Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to synthesize, then display condensed information to the pilot may be able to increase SA by making it easier to perceive and comprehend information. Rather than presenting the pilot with a long list of data, automation should process and condense this data then present the most relevant pieces (Endsley & Garland, 2010;Schutte & Willshire, 1997). The reduction in the amount of information can help pilots find important data much faster and easier.…”
Section: Automation For Human Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aviation literature shows that standardization of the physical environment in which flight crews work contributes to process and workflow standardization and safer performance. In aerospace, the standardization of processes and environments gained currency owing to substantial evidence that human factors are the underlying causes of error (Jorna & Hoogeboom, 2004; Schutte & Willshire, 1997). Human error has been shown to be associated with 80% of fatal accidents in aviation, and records of worldwide accidents involving commercial jets between 1959 and 1995 show that flight crew error was the primary cause in 64.4% of the accidents (Noyes, Starr, & Kazem, 2004).…”
Section: The Safety Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges associated with human-machine interactions that involve the negative transfer of learning while switching aircrafts (Lande, 1997; Spitzer, 2006) and unnatural or nonintuitive interfaces (Schutte & Willshire, 1997) constitute one area of focus. Advancements in technology contribute considerably to this challenge (Lande, 1997; Spitzer, 2006).…”
Section: The Safety Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KE was invented by recognizing the semantic meaning of mentioned words as the actualization of the hidden feelings and emotions [24]. The previous steps were focused on identifying the impression/feeling/emotion of user towards the passenger seat, whereas semantic differentiation stages were taken to understand the realization of the impression/feeling/emotion on product design [25,26].…”
Section: Semantic Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%