2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03173674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing the best urban, preservice elementary science methods course: Dilemmas and considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reasonable, considering that most primary teachers are required to teach all learning areas in the Australian context, although each learning area has its own approaches and focuses. Moscovici and Osisioma (2008) believe that some preservice primary teachers experience 'sciencephobia' at various levels, which the authors believe stems from unsuccessful science learning in the past. Preservice teachers, regardless of their previous experiences in science, enter university science methods courses with preconceived ideas about what science teaching and learning should look like (Hubbard & Abell, 2005).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Self-efficacy and Science Teachingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is reasonable, considering that most primary teachers are required to teach all learning areas in the Australian context, although each learning area has its own approaches and focuses. Moscovici and Osisioma (2008) believe that some preservice primary teachers experience 'sciencephobia' at various levels, which the authors believe stems from unsuccessful science learning in the past. Preservice teachers, regardless of their previous experiences in science, enter university science methods courses with preconceived ideas about what science teaching and learning should look like (Hubbard & Abell, 2005).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Self-efficacy and Science Teachingmentioning
confidence: 92%