2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2017.8172377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing evidence from design-oriented and survey/ interview-based studies of telepresence robots suggests that such robots can increase the agency, presence and social inclusion of remote students (e.g. Cha, Chen, and Mataric 2017;Fitter et al 2018). However, there is an apparent research gap related to substantiating these kinds of claims with micro-level interactional evidence (but outside classrooms, see Liao et al 2019).…”
Section: Coordinating Joint Attention In the Materials Ecology Of Video-mediated Instructional Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing evidence from design-oriented and survey/ interview-based studies of telepresence robots suggests that such robots can increase the agency, presence and social inclusion of remote students (e.g. Cha, Chen, and Mataric 2017;Fitter et al 2018). However, there is an apparent research gap related to substantiating these kinds of claims with micro-level interactional evidence (but outside classrooms, see Liao et al 2019).…”
Section: Coordinating Joint Attention In the Materials Ecology Of Video-mediated Instructional Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their work, they reviewed the major hardware and software components associated with telepresence systems. Other research approaches, such as that by Cha et al [15], evaluated different design elements associated with robot and interface systems for deploying the platforms in classroom scenarios. Based on the Beam system, they analyzed different user experience challenges in teaching sessions through telepresence, such as communications, inclusion, or embodiment.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with this non-anthropomorphic shape, such robots prove to be valuable for education, and embodiment constitutes a cornerstone of student engagement [17]. The addition of other humanoid features to the robot is usually omitted due to bandwidth requirements, as well as an increased interaction complexity and higher cognitive load for users [15]. In terms of interface, the final operator is provided with information similar to that of videoconferencing software, i.e., audiovisual data from the local robot are transmitted to the remote operator, and vice versa.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are enabling new applications in educational technology, such as robots [5,20]. Robots have been used in the classroom as a tool for explaining science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts (for reviews see: Benitti [7]; Mikropoulos & Bellou [39]), to provide remote access (e.g., [10]), and as an embodied social agent that acts as a teacher or classroom companion (e.g., [28]). Our focus is on exploring how robots, as social agents, should interact with teachers and students in the classroom, specifically during learning activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%