Designing Suspended Scaffold Structural Support Elements and Lifeline Anchorages in Conformance with Federal OSHA Requirements

Hill, Howard J.; Searer, Gary R.; Dethlefs, Richard A.; Lewis, Jonathan; Paret, Terrence F.

doi:10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000051

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent years have shown an increase in research on scaffolding safety (Khudeira [9]; Pishes et al [10]). Hill et al [11]) studied the design of suspended-scaffold structural support elements and lifeline anchorages according to federal OSHA requirements. Chuyang and Luli [12] researched the finite element model of a scaffolding system to determine the influence of joint stiffness on the overall stiffness of the scaffold and load distribution at the bottom of bowl scaffolds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Evaluation of Tie Bar Effects on Structural Behavior of Suspended Scaffolding Systems

Sevim¹,

Bekiroğlu²,

Arslan³

2017

Volume 13 Number 1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:The collapse of scaffolds can bring about substantial damage and economic loss. In recent years, over hundreds of people died and an even greater number have been injured because of inadequate scaffolding system designs. In this study, the effects of truss height and number of tie bars on the structural behavior of suspended scaffolding systems were experimentally investigated. Three full-scale scaffolding systems with truss heights of 30, 45, and 60 cm were tested in the laboratory. Each system included a wooden floor, steel purlins and trusses. The number of steel tie bars connected to the systems was also varied. A load transmission system was placed in these experimental systems to distribute single loads to the center of a specific area in a step-by-step manner using a load jack. After each load increment, the displacement was measured by means of linear variable differential transducers placed at critical points of the wooden floor, purlins, and trusses. This test was repeated for all systems and under all system conditions. The test results revealed that displacement increased exponentially in scaffolds with truss heights of 30, 45, and 60 cm without tie bars. Under the same load, systems with truss heights of 60, 45, and 30 cm revealed displacements of 8.8, 12.1, and 23.3 cm, respectively. The results of this work demonstrate that the number of tie bars and truss height considerably affect the structural behavior of scaffolding systems. Our findings further suggest that a scaffolding system with 60 cm-high truss and two tie bars presents optimal safety and cost-savings.

show abstract