2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpp.2010.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Power-Aware Collective Communication Algorithms for InfiniBand Clusters

Abstract: Modern supercomputing systems have witnessed a phenomenal growth in the recent history owing to the advent of multi-core architectures and high speed networks. However, the operational and maintenance costs of these systems have also grown rapidly. Several concepts such as Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) and CPU Throttling have been proposed to conserve the power consumed by the compute nodes during idle periods. However, it is necessary to design software stacks in a power-aware manner to minimiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DVFS is combined in [4] with concurrency throttling on multicore systems to obtain energy savings. In [11], algorithms to save energy in the collectives, such as MPI Alltoall and MPI Bcast, are proposed. The work in [10] describes a runtime system for the Intel Single-chip Cloud Computer (SCC) processor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DVFS is combined in [4] with concurrency throttling on multicore systems to obtain energy savings. In [11], algorithms to save energy in the collectives, such as MPI Alltoall and MPI Bcast, are proposed. The work in [10] describes a runtime system for the Intel Single-chip Cloud Computer (SCC) processor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as the number of cores within a node keep on increasing, this approach of forcing the sockets to remain idle during communication, can introduce significant performance overheads. The power saving achieved in [12] are be equivalent to executing the two sockets in a node at the minimum frequency and throttling state T 4 , whereas the approach proposed here achieves better power saving by keeping both sockets at minimum frequency and throttling to a higher state T 5 . The detailed experimental comparison of the two algorithms is left as future work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they differ significantly with the approach presented in this paper. Specifically, [12] assumes that throttling has a negative effect on internode communication. Thus, the authors of [12] redesign the all-to-all operation, such that a set of sockets does not take part in communication a some point of time, and thus, may throttled.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations