Designing out barriers to student access and participation in secondary school assessment

Abstract

In an effort to support student agency in assessment, teachers seek to provide detailed instructions and advice in associated assessment task sheets. In this paper, we analyse a sample English assessment task to consider how such assessment design practices might inadvertently create barriers to access and participation. To make our case, we highlight the learning characteristics of students in two of the most prevalent disability groups: students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and students with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). The paper links student agency to the problem of equity by analysing the conditions and criteria of access that are built into assessment design. The article concludes with design recommendations to help improve access for all students, including students in these two highly prevalent disability groups.

The characteristics, life circumstances and self-concept of 13 year olds with and without disabilities in Ireland: A secondary analysis of the Growing Up in Ireland (GUI) study

“…Further, this group reportedly received the least amount of SLT support in school than children with other disability types. Given the essential role that language plays in accessing the curriculum [70,71], and the lifelong implications of having reduced language skills [72,73], this finding is concerning.…”

A scoping review of 20 years of research on differentiation: investigating conceptualisation, characteristics, and methods used

“…Although Gardner has stressed that MI is not the same as learning styles and has cautioned educators to avoid one‐size‐fits‐all instruction by individualising as much as possible (Strauss, 2013), the practical application of MI to differentiation remains common and can be just as problematic as differentiating by students' preferred modality. This is because both approaches can mask differences that really matter, such as oral language competence and executive function (Graham et al ., 2018), particularly for students with disabilities for whom differentiation is often recommended. In this regard, we concur with Landrum and McDuffie (2010) who argued, ‘It is wise to individualise instruction.…”

Conditions that mediate teacher agency during assessment reform

“…Checklist. A checklist of practices for accessible assessment design that had been generated by the researchers (Graham et al, 2018) was experienced as an enabling condition by the teachers of Coastal High School. Mariah said:…”