2012
DOI: 10.1364/boe.3.001291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing microarray phantoms for hyperspectral imaging validation

Abstract: The design and fabrication of custom-tailored microarrays for use as phantoms in the characterization of hyperspectral imaging systems is described. Corresponding analysis methods for biologically relevant samples are also discussed. An image-based phantom design was used to program a microarrayer robot to print prescribed mixtures of dyes onto microscope slides. The resulting arrays were imaged by a hyperspectral imaging microscope. The shape of the spots results in significant scattering signals, which can b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such optical measurement systems for biomedical applications rely on tissue-equivalent phantoms for testing system design and comparing di®erent measurement methods. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Use of real human tissues is impractical since the optical properties of such samples change in various atmospheric conditions (i.e., humidity, temperature) and rapidly degrade over time, thus they are unusable as standards with known and stable properties. Therefore, optical properties of phantoms (scattering coe±cient s , absorption coe±cient a , scattering anisotropy factor g, refractive index n, and thickness L) should be properly tuned to correspond to that of tissues they mimic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such optical measurement systems for biomedical applications rely on tissue-equivalent phantoms for testing system design and comparing di®erent measurement methods. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Use of real human tissues is impractical since the optical properties of such samples change in various atmospheric conditions (i.e., humidity, temperature) and rapidly degrade over time, thus they are unusable as standards with known and stable properties. Therefore, optical properties of phantoms (scattering coe±cient s , absorption coe±cient a , scattering anisotropy factor g, refractive index n, and thickness L) should be properly tuned to correspond to that of tissues they mimic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical signal response of a phantom is then identical to that of a tissue making it valid for instrument calibration. [7][8][9][36][37][38][39] Therefore, the exact reconstruction of the scattering and absorption may be performed based only on accurate measurements. We estimated the coefficients μ a , μ 0 s , and g for each phantom using spectrometric measurements and the IAD calculations.…”
Section: Fundamental Parameters Of Tissue Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The development and evaluation of such methods require frequent calibration of the devices. However, real biological tissues differ greatly from each other and their optical properties are susceptible to rapid changes over time and with varying environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a novel, custom-tailored microarray printing platform was developed[ 5 , 6 ] to create a testbed for characterizing hyperspectral imaging systems and validating algorithm performance. This microarray printing system allows for precise sample composition through variation of dye concentrations and mixture proportions, and high spatial control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overlap presents a considerable challenge when trying to determine the concentration and proportion of a particular dye at a given spatial location where two dyes have been mixed. While not presented here, multicolor phantoms have been developed where the spectral signatures are more distinct, making estimation of the abundance fraction (somewhat) easier[ 11 , 5 , 6 ]. The two remaining signatures correspond to the PEG and background spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%