Designing Interventions that Last: A Classification of Environmental Behaviors in Relation to the Activities, Costs, and Effort Involved for Adoption and Maintenance

Abstract

Policy makers draw on behavioral research to design interventions that promote the voluntary adoption of environmental behavior in societies. Many environmental behaviors will only be effective if they are maintained over the long-term. In the context of climate change and concerns about future water security, behaviors that involve reducing energy consumption and improving water quality must be continued indefinitely to mitigate global warming and preserve scarce resources. Previous reviews of environmental behavior have focused exclusively on factors related to adoption. This review investigates the factors that influence both adoption and maintenance, and presents a classification of environmental behaviors in terms of the activities, costs, and effort required for both adoption and maintenance. Three categories of behavior are suggested. One-off behaviors involve performing an activity once, such as purchasing an energy efficient washing machine, or signing a petition. Continuous behaviors involve the performance of the same set of behaviors for adoption and for maintenance, such as curbside recycling. Dynamic behaviors involve the performance of different behaviors for adoption and maintenance, such as revegetation. Behaviors can also be classified into four categories related to cost and effort: those that involve little cost and effort for adoption and maintenance, those that involve moderate cost and effort for adoption and maintenance, those that involve a high cost or effort for adoption and less for maintenance, and those that involve less cost or effort for adoption and a higher amount for maintenance. In order to design interventions that last, policy makers should consider the factors that influence the maintenance as well as the adoption of environmental behaviors.

Excluding stock from riverbanks for environmental restoration: The influence of social norms, drought, and off-farm income on landholder behaviour

“…Thus, landholders may be influenced by different motivations and barriers to adopt a project, as compared to maintaining a project (Moore & Boldero, 2017). Establishing stock exclusion is subsidized, however, maintenance involves costs associated with growing or purchasing additional feed for stock to compensate for lost fodder after the exclusion of stock from grazing riverbanks.…”

Integrating Methods and Empirical Findings from Social and Behavioural Sciences into Energy System Models—Motivation and Possible Approaches

“…On a macro level, these factors are represented in aggregated form with realistic profiles. Second, the change of user behaviour, where aspects such as rebound effects, sufficiency, or grid-friendly behaviour play a role and where it is essential to identify factors and interventions that can effectively and reliably change behaviour (e.g., [137]). Of particular interest are aspects such as which technologies are used by whom and when, as well as the willingness-to-accept (WTA) or to adapt their demand according to, e.g., external controls of operation schedules for home storage systems or electrical vehicles to facilitate grid-friendly demand (e.g., [138]).…”

Above and beyond? How businesses can drive sustainable development by promoting lasting pro‐environmental behaviour change: An examination of the IKEA Live Lagom project

“…Although most studies employ only a single type of intervention, research has found that behaviour change interventions are most effective when combining antecedent and consequent strategies (Abrahamse et al, 2005). The Live Lagom project is based on this notion and includes multiple elements tackling a range of different underlying motives to help promote lasting lifestyle change across behavioural domains (Moore & Boldero, 2017).…”