2014
DOI: 10.1145/2601097.2601166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing inflatable structures

Abstract: Figure 1: An overview of our design system: the user provides a target shape (left) and sketches seams to indicate desired segment boundaries (2 nd from left). Our system automatically computes flat panels such that the inflated structure (middle) is as close as possible to the target. The generated panels (2 nd from right) can be used to fabricate a physical prototype (right). AbstractWe propose an interactive, optimization-in-the-loop tool for designing inflatable structures. Given a target shape, the user d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not a primary concern of this work, it is worth noting that further developments are needed in order to render our method more efficient; as formulated, it inherently requires to resolve a buckling problem for each edge in the mesh, which are notoriously troublesome for Newton‐like methods. A rudimentary strategy to improve the initial guess and reduce buckling has been proposed, but we argue that further improvements can be achieved by applying our kinematic modification at the energy‐level rather than the strain level, as suggested in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not a primary concern of this work, it is worth noting that further developments are needed in order to render our method more efficient; as formulated, it inherently requires to resolve a buckling problem for each edge in the mesh, which are notoriously troublesome for Newton‐like methods. A rudimentary strategy to improve the initial guess and reduce buckling has been proposed, but we argue that further improvements can be achieved by applying our kinematic modification at the energy‐level rather than the strain level, as suggested in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, these approaches optimize object properties to meet a specific functional goal, and often consist of a mix of interactionand numerical optimization-based approaches. Recent work, for example, investigated the design of plush toys [Mori and Igarashi 2007], furniture [Saul et al 2011;Umetani et al 2012;Lau et al 2011;Schulz et al 2014], clothes [Umetani et al 2011], inflatable structures [Skouras et al 2014], wire meshes ], mechanical objects [Koo et al 2014;Zhu et al 2012;Coros et al 2013], and masonry structures [Whiting et al 2012;Vouga et al 2012].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance Energy To measure the distance between the source and optimized polylines in the 2D domain, we build a distance map, as in [Skouras et al 2014], using implicit moving least squares [Öztireli et al 2009]:…”
Section: Target Shapementioning
confidence: 99%