2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-020-04386-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing indenothiophene-based acceptor materials with efficient photovoltaic parameters for fullerene-free organic solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study,e xternal reorganizational energy is ignored as it does not contribute significantly and is much smaller.E quations (1) and (2) are helpful for computing the reorganizational energy of holes and electrons. [27][28][29][30]…”
Section: Computationalmethodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study,e xternal reorganizational energy is ignored as it does not contribute significantly and is much smaller.E quations (1) and (2) are helpful for computing the reorganizational energy of holes and electrons. [27][28][29][30]…”
Section: Computationalmethodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As external environmental changes do not contribute much, we are neglecting the external reorganizational energy in our report. With the aid of following equations, we can calculate the reorganization energies of the electron ( λ e ) and hole ( λ h ), [ 27–29 ] italicλe=[]EoE+[]EoEo λh=[]Eo+E++[]E+oEo …”
Section: Computational Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian 09 suit of program was used for conducting entire calculations, whereas GaussView 5.0 software [33] aids for the featuring of results. Initially, DFT and TDDFT calculations are carried out on reference molecule (R) using four functionals B3LYP, [34] MPW1PW91, [35] CAM-B3LYP, [36] and ωB97XD [37] combined with 6-31G(d,p) [38][39][40][41] basis set. Result of maximum absorption of reference molecule (R) at above-mentioned levels of theory was compared with experimentally recorded maxima of R. After careful evaluation of absorption maxima (λ max ) with reported experimental value, the MPW1PW91 method in conjunction with 6-31G(d,p) basis set was chosen for further computational analysis because of its nearest correspondence with experimental result of reference R. Hence, the simulated data of the absorption spectrum for all designed structures FH1-FH5 obtained at same level MPW1PW91/6-31G(d,p) of theory.…”
Section: Computational Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, valuable literature also suggested that these four functionals with 6-31G(d,p) basis set were extensively used for evaluation of best method with 6-31G (d,p) basis set. [38][39][40][41]44] 3.2 | FMO analysis FMO analysis of R and selected compounds FH1, FH2, FH3, FH4, and FH5 are performed at MPW1PW91 level of theory combined with 6-31G(d,p) basis set. The optimized geometries of designed and reference molecules calculated at same method are shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Chemistry Of Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%