1996
DOI: 10.2307/420794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing In-Class Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined educational outcomes, assigned background materials to provide students with a clear understanding of the simulated situation, created specifi c ground rules, and held a debriefi ng session to evaluate outcomes (Lantis 1998 ;Smith and Boyer 1996 ). The most specifi c learning goal was to help students understand EU-US relations, especially the relevance and ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... T h e Te a c h e r : N e g o t i a t i n g t h e T r a n s a t l a n t i c R e l a t i o n s h i p complexity of trade relations.…”
Section: Simulation Description and Learning Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined educational outcomes, assigned background materials to provide students with a clear understanding of the simulated situation, created specifi c ground rules, and held a debriefi ng session to evaluate outcomes (Lantis 1998 ;Smith and Boyer 1996 ). The most specifi c learning goal was to help students understand EU-US relations, especially the relevance and ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... T h e Te a c h e r : N e g o t i a t i n g t h e T r a n s a t l a n t i c R e l a t i o n s h i p complexity of trade relations.…”
Section: Simulation Description and Learning Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political scientists have recognized simulations as important pedagogical tools in political science for some time (Grafton and Permaloff 1989;Kaarbo and Lantis 1997;Koch 1991;McQuaid 1992;Reeher and Cammarano 1997;Smith and Boyer 1996;Vavrina 1995). But while all of the simulations described in the literature represent impressive efforts in innovative pedagogy, their level of sophistication may make them difficult use in to some courses or institutions.…”
Section: Simulations In Political Science Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives them a chance to build a better understanding of current events or specific real-life cases. Debriefing also can open the question of how well the experience simulates real life, which in itself is a useful analytical exercise (Smith and Boyer 1996). Our preferred assessment and debriefing method is to assign a response essay after Phase 4, in which students organize their thoughts before discussing them with the class.…”
Section: Phase 5: Debriefing and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%