2016
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.5127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review

Abstract: BackgroundThe current landscape of a rapidly aging population accompanied by multiple chronic conditions presents numerous challenges to optimally support the complex needs of this group. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have shown promise in supporting older persons to manage chronic conditions; however, there remains a dearth of evidence-informed guidance to develop such innovations.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review of current practices and recommendations for designing,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
285
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(162 reference statements)
7
285
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of actual experiences and perceived problems of patients and healthcare professionals [25], and the balance of lay knowledge and scientific knowledge [14], are two challenges development teams face in improving mHealth design. Effectively collaborating among stakeholders with differing interests is a consistent research finding in an existing literature review by Matthew-Maich et al [27]. Yet the mutual benefit for healthcare providers to support patient empowerment in disease selfmanagement is the reduced need for active, real-time feedback by healthcare professionals, thus lowering financial expenditure, improving access and long-term sustainability [16].…”
Section: Tension Between Healthcare Provider and Healthcare Consumermentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of actual experiences and perceived problems of patients and healthcare professionals [25], and the balance of lay knowledge and scientific knowledge [14], are two challenges development teams face in improving mHealth design. Effectively collaborating among stakeholders with differing interests is a consistent research finding in an existing literature review by Matthew-Maich et al [27]. Yet the mutual benefit for healthcare providers to support patient empowerment in disease selfmanagement is the reduced need for active, real-time feedback by healthcare professionals, thus lowering financial expenditure, improving access and long-term sustainability [16].…”
Section: Tension Between Healthcare Provider and Healthcare Consumermentioning
confidence: 69%
“…They developed a digital technology even knowing that rural patients may not have reliable internet access and therefore adapted their design to require internet access for download only [24]. Consistent with the existing scoping literature review by Matthew-Maich, Harris [27], recommendations from research findings and theoretical perspectives support the need for user-centred design approaches in mHealth development benefiting usability and feasibility.…”
Section: User-centred Mhealth Design In Person-centred Healthcarementioning
confidence: 77%
“…There was an unintentional increase in older and female users; therefore, special instruction should be provided to subgroups with a low level of literacy or e-literacy [10]. In addition, comprehensive assessment is required to consider enduser's physical conditions and preparedness prior to implementing the mHealth intervention [39]. In addition, clinicians should be prepared to satisfy mHealth care needs of older adults, both clinically and technically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most papers outlining mHealth solutions discussed the products designed for use by patients and or healthcare providers. In sum, the study suggests a limited yet increasing use of mHealth in home healthcare for older adults, with recommendations for mHealth products that are more user-centered and collaborative to better enhance feasibility, acceptability, and usability, 35 based on methodologies found in the fields of human factors engineering and human computer interaction.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%