Designing gaze-supported multimodal interactions for the exploration of large image collections

Stellmach, Sophie; Stober, Sebastian; Nürnberger, Andreas; Dachselt, Raimund

doi:10.1145/1983302.1983303

Cited by 51 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stellmach et al evaluated techniques in several works that combine gaze and mobile input, i.e., inertial sensing and touch [22,20]. Their work developed techniques to navigate large image collections on public displays.…”

Section: Multi-modal Gaze Interaction With Public Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their work developed techniques to navigate large image collections on public displays. Techniques used gaze for pointing while touch and accelerometer values were used to pan and zoom through images [22]. Users perceived increased effort and complexity when panning and zooming.…”

Section: Multi-modal Gaze Interaction With Public Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gaze is a natural modality choice for selecting objects that catch our visual attention, while touch actions can be performed on personal devices without visual attention. Related work has employed handheld device input, combined with gaze interaction, to assist panning and zooming [22] and target acquisition [20] on desktop displays. Our work is distinct in demonstrating the gazesupported transfer of objects across devices.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Eye Pull, Eye Push: Moving Objects between Large Screens and Personal Devices with Gaze and Touch

Turner

Alexander

Bulling

et al. 2013

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Multi-modal Gaze Interaction With Public Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multi-modal Gaze Interaction With Public Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Eye Pull, Eye Push: Moving Objects between Large Screens and Personal Devices with Gaze and Touch

Turner

Alexander

Bulling

et al. 2013

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Midas touch is problem connected with the use of users' gaze in humancomputer interaction. Solution by Stellmach et al [25] aims on overcoming the Midas Touch problem with connecting the gaze controlled interaction with the touch-and-tilt device to indicate desired reaction. This approach could be utilized in an ambient interface with gestures.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tools Used in Ambient User Interfaces

Galko¹,

Porubãn²

2016

AEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research of ambient user interfaces is popular among many researchers. The main idea is that a user interface would react onto its user and would execute reactions on his/her actions. Main problem with creating ambient user interface is that for different domains the human-computer interaction changes. In this article we investigate different tools that are employed in ambient user interface and the different approaches how they are used. We focus mainly on the use of the multi-display set-up, touch screens, kinect, eye-tracking devices and brain-computer interface technology. We propose approaches how they can be utilized in an ambient user interface, how they affect the user and how they can be used for the evaluation of ambient user interface. It is essential for future research that these measures evaluate the efficiency of the use of ambient user interface in different domains. We briefly analyze natural user interface and its association to ambient user interface. In the conclusion we establish the steps for the future research of this topic.

show abstract

“…Stellmach et al investigated combinations of gaze with a wide variety of modalities [10], including a keyboard [23], tilt gestures [23][24], a mouse wheel [24], touch gestures [24][25] [26] and foot pedals [27]. A common interaction paradigm in gazebased interaction is that of gaze-supported interaction-gaze suggests and the other modality confirms [25].…”

Section: Gaze In Multimodal Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Empirical Investigation of Gaze Selection in Mid-Air Gestural 3D Manipulation

Velloso

Turner

Alexander

et al. 2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In this work, we investigate gaze selection in the context of mid-air hand gestural manipulation of 3D rigid bodies on monoscopic displays. We present the results of a user study with 12 participants in which we compared the performance of Gaze, a Raycasting technique (2D Cursor) and a Virtual Hand technique (3D Cursor) to select objects in two 3D mid-air interaction tasks. Also, we compared selection confirmation times for Gaze selection when selection is followed by manipulation to when it is not. Our results show that gaze selection is faster and more preferred than 2D and 3D mid-air-controlled cursors, and is particularly well suited for tasks in which users constantly switch between several objects during the manipulation. Further, selection confirmation times are longer when selection is followed by manipulation than when it is not.

show abstract

Designing gaze-supported multimodal interactions for the exploration of large image collections

Cited by 51 publications

References 17 publications

Eye Pull, Eye Push: Moving Objects between Large Screens and Personal Devices with Gaze and Touch

Eye Pull, Eye Push: Moving Objects between Large Screens and Personal Devices with Gaze and Touch

Tools Used in Ambient User Interfaces

An Empirical Investigation of Gaze Selection in Mid-Air Gestural 3D Manipulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About