Abstract:This paper describes a participatory workshop as part of a larger process to design an inclusive museum space. The workshop covers a number of sessions that go from mutual introductions, over idea generation, to synthesis of an architectural concept. We discuss the participants' experience of the process that is set up to allow for a balanced exchange between architects and user/experts living with an impairment. We also discuss the outcome of the process in terms of its expression of inclusive museum architec… Show more
“…Todos os projetos utilizam recursos táteis e auditivos. Além disso, Cullen e Metatla acrescentam recursos olfativos, Vermeersch et al (2018) Com relação à metodologia (tabela 3), foram utilizadas técnicas variadas. Como apontou Meneses (2014), a escolha dos métodos, técnicas e ferramentas depende do contexto da pesquisa.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…Todas as técnicas presentes na tabela 3 são comuns à metodologia do design, sendo algumas mais especificamente relacionadas à abordagem do co-design. Quanto ao nível de participação, utilizando a categorização sugerida por Simon (2010), apenas Vermeersch et al (2018) chegaram efetivamente à co-criação com o público com deficiência visual. Entre as razões para isso estão o fato de que a amostra utilizada contava com profissionais da área de arquitetura e design, o que facilitou o processo de criação.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…Todos têm um caráter experimental, com objetos variados e inusitados, com exceção de Vermeersch et al (2018), onde os participantes receberam apenas a maquete do espaço em que iriam intervir, pois esse projeto tinha como intenção alterar um espaço já existente. Quanto aos resultados, os participantes da pesquisa de Vermeersch et al (2018) demonstraram um apreço pelo workshop inicial onde houve um breve sobre conceitos básicos de arquitetura e de construção de protótipos de baixa fidelidade.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…DI LORETO & HING TING (2018) VERMEERSCH et al (2018) WORKSHOPS BRULE et al (2016) CULLEN & METATLA (2019)Tabela 5 -Workshops de co-design. Fonte:Di Loreto & Hing Ting (2018);Vermeersch et al (2018);Brule et al (2016);Cullen & Metatla (2019) …”
This article aims to conduct an analysis of the use of co-design methodologies in accessibility projects for the visually impaired in museums. The article presents a discussion of the practices of participatory methodologies in museum projects, in particular the co-design approach. It proceeds with a comparative case study, analyzing articles that describe the implementation of co-design projects in museum and educational contexts. The purpose of this comparative study is to present different methods of co-design, what goals can be achieved by these methodologies and to analyze and compare the results and challenges found. The authors selected four co-design projects for this comparative study, analyzing their differences and similarities. The conclusion of this analysis is that participatory projects bring as a benefit not only the creation of new audiences, but the enrichment of the museum object itself, promoting new forms of enjoyment and acquisition of knowledge. This article aims to contribute to the development of future studies and projects on accessibility that may represent better
“…Todos os projetos utilizam recursos táteis e auditivos. Além disso, Cullen e Metatla acrescentam recursos olfativos, Vermeersch et al (2018) Com relação à metodologia (tabela 3), foram utilizadas técnicas variadas. Como apontou Meneses (2014), a escolha dos métodos, técnicas e ferramentas depende do contexto da pesquisa.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…Todas as técnicas presentes na tabela 3 são comuns à metodologia do design, sendo algumas mais especificamente relacionadas à abordagem do co-design. Quanto ao nível de participação, utilizando a categorização sugerida por Simon (2010), apenas Vermeersch et al (2018) chegaram efetivamente à co-criação com o público com deficiência visual. Entre as razões para isso estão o fato de que a amostra utilizada contava com profissionais da área de arquitetura e design, o que facilitou o processo de criação.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…Todos têm um caráter experimental, com objetos variados e inusitados, com exceção de Vermeersch et al (2018), onde os participantes receberam apenas a maquete do espaço em que iriam intervir, pois esse projeto tinha como intenção alterar um espaço já existente. Quanto aos resultados, os participantes da pesquisa de Vermeersch et al (2018) demonstraram um apreço pelo workshop inicial onde houve um breve sobre conceitos básicos de arquitetura e de construção de protótipos de baixa fidelidade.…”
Section: Estudos De Caso De Uso Do Co-design Em Projetos De Acessibilidade Para Pessoas Com Deficiência Visualunclassified
“…DI LORETO & HING TING (2018) VERMEERSCH et al (2018) WORKSHOPS BRULE et al (2016) CULLEN & METATLA (2019)Tabela 5 -Workshops de co-design. Fonte:Di Loreto & Hing Ting (2018);Vermeersch et al (2018);Brule et al (2016);Cullen & Metatla (2019) …”
This article aims to conduct an analysis of the use of co-design methodologies in accessibility projects for the visually impaired in museums. The article presents a discussion of the practices of participatory methodologies in museum projects, in particular the co-design approach. It proceeds with a comparative case study, analyzing articles that describe the implementation of co-design projects in museum and educational contexts. The purpose of this comparative study is to present different methods of co-design, what goals can be achieved by these methodologies and to analyze and compare the results and challenges found. The authors selected four co-design projects for this comparative study, analyzing their differences and similarities. The conclusion of this analysis is that participatory projects bring as a benefit not only the creation of new audiences, but the enrichment of the museum object itself, promoting new forms of enjoyment and acquisition of knowledge. This article aims to contribute to the development of future studies and projects on accessibility that may represent better
“…With the 'sensory shift', modern museums have begun to reconsider their limitations to the sensory use of objects, and they are starting to explore the potential of multi-sensory solutions to improve knowledge transfer in museums and increase engagement with visitors by connecting them with the sensory properties of historic objects, their contexts and the stories behind, also providing emotionally enriched experiences. With increasing numbers of studies indicating that interacting with sensory objects have social, cognitive and even therapeutic value, especially for people with disabilities [46][47][48][49][50][51][52], museums are enhancing their valuation on 'touch' which is regarded as a therapy tool and a cultural communication platform [53][54][55][56], 'sound' which creates a sense of spatial experience [57,58] and 'smell' which triggers personal memories, imagination and emotion [59][60][61].…”
Museums are much more than repositories of cultural relics to be preserved for the future. They are centers of learning, community centers, social hubs—even places of healing and contemplation. The museum experience is a multilayered journey that is proprioceptive, sensory, aesthetic and social. In this context, this study takes the case of the ‘People at the Seashore’ multisensory area in the folk exhibition of Taizhou Museum, applies three data collection techniques (questionnaire, in-depth interview and observation) to assess various types of experiences (object, cognitive, social and introspective) and effects (visceral, cognitive and emotional) in the museum, and analyzes the practical effect and relative merits of the multisensory approaches used in this exhibition through the lens of communication effect. Accordingly, multi-senses acquire creative significances upon the attractive and holding power of museum exhibitions, specifically the emotional relevance and resonances. Thus, museums should be more concerned with the connection and complex interaction between senses and experience, meanwhile be active with visual, auditory, olfactory, taste and proprioceptive experiences and engage in the potential impact on visitors from cognitive and emotional aspects, which is an important trend for the museum’s future development and also the vision of this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.