2002
DOI: 10.1080/03052150215717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for maintenance: A game theoretic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-cooperative protocol enables separation of design and manufacturing, but the solution process is tedious and difficult; in some cases, the solution may not converge. Furthermore, non-cooperative or leader/follower solutions are not necessarily Pareto efficient, although Hernandez and coauthors have suggested a technique for obtaining Pareto efficient solutions for these protocols (Hernandez et al 2002a(Hernandez et al , 2002b. The authors recommend the use of a leader/follower protocol to facilitate the separation of design and manufacturing activities because it accommodates scenarios in which one engineering team dominates the decisionmaking process.…”
Section: Step 2: Representing Cooperation Styles Using Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The non-cooperative protocol enables separation of design and manufacturing, but the solution process is tedious and difficult; in some cases, the solution may not converge. Furthermore, non-cooperative or leader/follower solutions are not necessarily Pareto efficient, although Hernandez and coauthors have suggested a technique for obtaining Pareto efficient solutions for these protocols (Hernandez et al 2002a(Hernandez et al , 2002b. The authors recommend the use of a leader/follower protocol to facilitate the separation of design and manufacturing activities because it accommodates scenarios in which one engineering team dominates the decisionmaking process.…”
Section: Step 2: Representing Cooperation Styles Using Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reliability of a mechanical system depends on its design, the quality of its components, and its maintenance. However, maintenance is typically considered during product design in an ad hoc, ineffective manner, leading to unnecessary life-cycle costs [37].…”
Section: Autonomous Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are currently developing the intellectual and computing infrastructure to address many of these challenges, but those topics are addressed elsewhere (cf. [18][19][20][21]). …”
Section: Process-structure-property Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%