Connecting Families 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4192-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for Collocated Couples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shove (2003Shove ( , 2007 pays attention to materiality in the home. Barnham and Harrison (2013) treat collocated couples as a design topic, and Neustaedter et al (2013) refer to family life as a continuous "work in progress". Laurier and Wiggins (2012) have used video to study family meal times.…”
Section: The Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shove (2003Shove ( , 2007 pays attention to materiality in the home. Barnham and Harrison (2013) treat collocated couples as a design topic, and Neustaedter et al (2013) refer to family life as a continuous "work in progress". Laurier and Wiggins (2012) have used video to study family meal times.…”
Section: The Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, technologies that fail to support mixed-ability, collaborative use can create missed opportunities for shared experiences and spontaneous acts of kindness, both of which are important intimacy-building activities [12]. Like Branham et al [4], we found that even collocated partners need help reconnecting.…”
Section: Accessibility and Relational Wellbeing Are Intertwinedmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although this area of study has predominately sought to create connections between remote households [12,20], some recent work has considered how collocated family members and intimate partners communicate and connect in the domestic space [4,36]. This line of research increasingly considers families and relationships that have been traditionally marginalized or overlooked [17,19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design space for remote intimate couples has largely been populated with technologies that support and mediate intimacy via abstracted presence [18,19]. Gaver categorizes these technologies into two groups, those which mediate intimate behaviors and those which provoke intimate reactions [3].…”
Section: Prototypes For Mediated Intimacymentioning
confidence: 99%