Designing E-Worksheet Based On Problem-Based Learning To Improve Critical Thinking

Sujatmika, Sigit; Irfan, Muhammad; Ernawati, Tias; Wijayanti, Astuti; Widodo, Sri Adi; Amalia, Ayu; Nurdiyanto, Heri; Rahim, Robbi

doi:10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2281282

Cited by 20 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The instruments in this study were modules, questionnaires, and tests. Before the module is used in learning, the module is first validated which includes the following aspects of assessment: aspects of teaching materials, aspects of the material, aspects of an organization, presentation, and writing, and aspects of language and readability [9]. The independence questionnaire includes indicators of confidence, discipline, initiative, responsibility, and motivation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Students are required to be active and creative, able to develop their ideas to construct their thoughts [5], [6]. Efforts can be made by educators to improve the learning independence of students one of which is to provide good teaching materials [7]- [9]. Alternative teaching materials that can be used are modules.…”

Section: Based On Observations Made In the Mathematicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using the Set Theory Module in Think Pair Share Learning, Is It Effective?

Istiqomah¹,

Agustito²

2020

Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the use of set theory modules in Think Pair Share learning on independence and student learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with Posttest-Only Control Design. The subjects in this study were students of the mathematics education program class 2019 class A as an experimental class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation techniques. Data analysis uses descriptive statistics to reveal trends in initial abilities, learning independence, and learning outcomes. Data analysis using the t-test to test hypotheses with previously carried out the balance test, normality test, and homogeneity test. The results of this study indicate that the use of the Set Theory module in Think Pair Share learning is no more effective than without the use of the Set Theory module in Think Pair Share learning on student independence and learning outcomes

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Based On Observations Made In the Mathematicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the Set Theory Module in Think Pair Share Learning, Is It Effective?

Istiqomah¹,

Agustito²

2020

Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The importance of this may have caused the Indonesian government to include a critical thinking component in the 2013 curriculum which must be applied by teachers in teaching in schools. The ability to think critically in mathematics is a process of critical thinking related to mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and mathematical evidence on mathematical problem solving [16], [17]. Therefore, before the teacher practices students' critical thinking skills in the classroom.…”

Section: Minister Of National Education Regulation Number 22mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Teacher’s Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems

Indrawatiningsih¹,

As’ari²,

Hakim³

2020

Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study to describe the critical thinking skills of master students who are high school / high school / MA teachers being studied. This type of research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Data was collected from the results of critical thinking skills tests and interviews. Furthermore, the data collected were analyzed based on indicators of critical thinking capacity determined by researchers which included interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference and explanation. The subjects of this study were 2 people who were considered potential researchers to have critical thinking skills. This can be seen when attending lectures and observing learning in the classroom. Based on the results of the analysis of the results of interviews and interview results subject 1 has the capacity to think critically better than on subject 2. Subject 1 can achieve five indicators of capacity for critical thinking, while subject 2 only on 3 indicators: interpretation, analysis and evaluation. On the inference and explanation indicators, subjects 2 are not fulfilled. This is because subject 2 only looks at solving problems from one angle without paying attention to other perspectives, which in the end will be able to draw some conclusions.

show abstract

“…According to National Minister Education Regulation Number 22 Year 2006 explaining the content standards, studying mathematics aims to enable students: (1) Understanding mathematical concepts, explaining the interrelationships concepts and applying the concepts or the algorithms, flexibly, accurately, efficiently, and precisely, in problem solving; (2) Using reasoning on patterns and character, carrying out mathematical manipulations in making generalizations, compiling proof, or explaining mathematical ideas and statements; (3) Solving problems include understanding problems ability, designing mathematical models, solving models and interpreting the solutions; (4) Communicating ideas with symbols, tables, diagrams or other media to explain the situation or problem; (5) Having an appreciating usefulness of mathematics ability in life, namely curiosity, attention, and interest in learning mathematics, as well as being tenacious and confident in problem solving [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effectiveness of Learning Circle Assisted by Geogebra Software Reviewed from Creative Thinking and Visual Thinking Ability of Junior High School Students

Nuryadi¹,

Fithriadhy²,

Setiana³

et al. 2020

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of creative thinking ability was one of the focuses in learning mathematics. Creative thinking is one of the skills needed in a society, so it is necessary to develop these skills as early as possible. This research aims to describe the effectiveness of learning circle assisted by Geogebra software reviewed from creative thinking and visual thinking ability of Junior High School students. This research was a quasi-experimental research using pretest-posttest control group design. The population was all grade VIII student of One State Sedayu Junior High School. Sample of this research was selected by purposive sampling technique. Two classes from eight classes were selected. The experimental class was VIII F and the control class was VIII G. The experimental class was taught by using Geogebra software while the control class is by using the conventional one. The instruments used on this research were creative thinking test and visual thinking ability test. The result of this research showed that learning circle assisted by Geogebra software is more effective than conventional method for improving creative thinking and visual thinking ability.

show abstract

Designing E-Worksheet Based On Problem-Based Learning To Improve Critical Thinking

Cited by 20 publications

References 20 publications

Using the Set Theory Module in Think Pair Share Learning, Is It Effective?

Using the Set Theory Module in Think Pair Share Learning, Is It Effective?

The Teacher’s Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems

The Effectiveness of Learning Circle Assisted by Geogebra Software Reviewed from Creative Thinking and Visual Thinking Ability of Junior High School Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About