2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing deep eutectic solvents for efficient CO2 capture: A data-driven screening approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ensures that each subset is utilized four times for training and once for validation. In ML modeling, when dealing with molecular compounds that exhibit changes in properties under different temperature and/or pressure conditions, two distinct cross-validation strategies can be employed. , Similar to training/test data splitting, the same two approaches were employed for model validation, namely, “data-points” splitting and “drug” splitting (Figure ). The key distinction between these approaches is that in the “drug” splitting protocol, the folds exclusively contain new drug components structures, whereas in the “data-points” splitting, the same drug structures with different solubilities under various state parameters can be assigned to different folds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures that each subset is utilized four times for training and once for validation. In ML modeling, when dealing with molecular compounds that exhibit changes in properties under different temperature and/or pressure conditions, two distinct cross-validation strategies can be employed. , Similar to training/test data splitting, the same two approaches were employed for model validation, namely, “data-points” splitting and “drug” splitting (Figure ). The key distinction between these approaches is that in the “drug” splitting protocol, the folds exclusively contain new drug components structures, whereas in the “data-points” splitting, the same drug structures with different solubilities under various state parameters can be assigned to different folds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) techniques show promise for accurately and effectively predicting the properties of chemical compounds. , In different fields, ML methods , are as accurate as traditional simulation techniques such as MD but require less computing power. , Molecular descriptor–based ML (DBML) models have been used to forecast the MPs of ILs. , Molecular descriptors are the numerical values that feature the molecular structures of the ILs. One of the earlier descriptors used group contribution, , which split molecules into fragments; the MP of an IL is calculated by summing the contribution of each fragment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps one of the biggest limitations of these methods is that many machine-learning models provide limited generalization capacity, potentially leading to inaccurate predictions when presented new chemical functionalities . In this regard, it is important to highlight a few DES-related databases recently published by Omar et al, Shi et al, Lavrinenko et al, Hou et al, Hopkins et al, Abdollahzadeh et al, and Makarov et al that can greatly facilitate the advancement of these methods. It is important to note that among other limitations, these databases typically include only a small number of nontraditional DES (such as those based on halogen bonding, X-DES), severely impairing the accuracy of any predictions related to these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%