2018
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-18-00038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Both Mandibular Central Incisors on One 3.0-mm Single-Piece Implant: Five Years' Outcome

Abstract: Deficient bone volume, anatomical limitations, lack of available mesio-distal space, adjacent teeth angulations, and surgical errors may lead to placement of narrow diameter implants. In such a scenario; a functional and esthetic yet sustainable replacement of missing more than one tooth becomes quite challenging. This article describes the successful restoration of missing both mandibular central incisors on one, 3mm single piece implant in three patients. Despite being a biomechanically complex presentation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 13 14 15 ] Anterior cantilever extensions are usually given in missing two adjacent maxillary/mandibular teeth such as both incisors or incisors and canine. [ 16 17 18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 13 14 15 ] Anterior cantilever extensions are usually given in missing two adjacent maxillary/mandibular teeth such as both incisors or incisors and canine. [ 16 17 18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are no adequate in-vivo studies on single implant-supported screw-retained cantilever prosthesis in mandibular anterior region, which has been a treatment option for edentulous sites with inadequate mesio-distal space. [ 16 17 18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant dentistry has seen rapid and remarkable progress in recent years. [ 1 ] Several questions have been raised concerning materials as well as designs of both implants and implant abutments to achieve maximum clinical success rates. [ 2 ] One of the debates is the choice between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses, which has long been discussed, but the best type of implant prosthesis remains controversial among practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%